But if there were a lottery and they'd all agreed to the procedure, you think that would be okay?
但如果他们抽签了,他们也都同意这一程序,那你认为就没问题,是吧?
One situation is when you're speaking with a friend who had given you really good advice that you failed to take.
一种情况是,当你正在和一个朋友交谈,他之前曾给你一些很好的建议,但你却没有采纳。
So, the curious thing about recursion is that pretty much always can you implement this idea of doing the same thing again and again and again but with smaller bytes each time.
可见,递归算法中新奇的一点是,为了实现一个想法,你可以一遍又一遍地做相同的事情,但每次的规模都会有所减小。
Well, you could say it dilutes it but it doesn't lower the price of your investment, in general.
你也可以说这是一种摊薄,但总体上,你的投资价值并没有因此减少
But you might have to,also, refer to a Psalm over here or to another passage over here. And it's too difficult if you're unraveling scrolls and everything.
但你也许还要查阅,诗篇或者另一段文字,而解卷展轴太麻烦了。
I will tell you that a good programmer, at least in my mind, may actually go back and modify the pseudo code as they realize they're missing things, but it's easier to do that when you're looking at a simple set of steps, than when you're in the middle of a pile of code.
至少我认为是这样的,如果他们发现遗漏了,一些步骤的话会,回过头去修改伪代码,但这当你面对一些大致的步骤时,这个过程就会比,面对一堆代码要简单的多。
as the surgeon, you are the captain of the ship, but you are not there alone, so you need to have a team with you.
作为一名外科医生,你就像是一艘船上的船长,但并非孤身一人,你需要一个团队一起协作。
This is simple. You could write it up very short and that will be a passing grade if you just write it up very short.
但这一篇很简单,你们可以写得很短,我会给你及格,如果你写得短的话。
But if you go on a plane which is accelerating, you're no longer inertial.
但如果你上了一架加速飞行的飞机,你就不再处于惯性状态了
Probably it wouldn't, you would probably get a little bit sick anyway, but recover.
或许免疫应答还做不到这一点,你可能仍会小病一场,但很快就康复
But I do want to tell you this one thing.
但我想告诉你一件事。
It's a more powerful method than something called a cross-sectional study, and I'll come back in a later lecture and talk about these in more detail, but a cross-sectional study means you're taking a snapshot of a population of people at one time.
这种方法比所谓的横断面研究更加有效,我将在以后的课中,再仔细讨论这个问题,但横断面研究是指,你一次记录下一群人的状况
But along with this conceptual framework, provided by none other than Thomas Hobbs in England, who had lived through the English Civil War and thought that you shouldn't mess around with this rights business, you need some sort of big powerful monarch there-- but there was a sense inherent in all of this.
但与之同存的另一种观点,是英国最具代表性的托马斯·霍布斯提出的,他经历过英国内战,且认为君主不该滥用手中权力,你需要的是一个有权利的君主,但这其中有一些内在的概念
It's not necessarily chronological, but at the same time it gives you a sense of successive metaphysical philosophers thinking about first causes, origins, and about whatever it is that determines everything else.
这不一定是按时间顺序排列的,但同时,它会给你一种感觉那就是,一位又一位形而上学哲学家,思考原动力,起源,思考到底是什么觉定了其他的一切。
You know, no one says that you can fire the head of the General Motors, by giving them this money, but once you decided they can do it, they can do it.
你知道,没有人说,你能让大众汽车的总裁走人,给他一笔钱,但一旦政府决定你能做,你就能做。
Maybe you want to argue it and we could have a discussion, but it might mean that American democracy, or democracy of any kind, helps to produce a particular kind of democratic soul.
也许你想争辩,果真如此,我们可以另作讨论,但那也许意谓着,美式民主,或任何一种民主,协助产生了,特定种类的民主灵魂。
They just create more dynamic community, and helps flourish because if you only have an opinion It's just my opinion and Saed's opinion, you don't like. Well, that's our opinions.
这些不同的见解创造出了更加富有活力的社团,因为如果你只有一种观点,比如只是我的观点,Saed的观点,你不喜欢,但现在是我们的观点。
and I think I really like that, there's a real friendliness, but it's not in your face.
而且我真的很喜欢,这里有一种真正的友好,但你不会觉得被打扰。
Because, as I said, you can only drive one car at a time and if you've got ten of them in the garage, then it doesn't really do you much good.
正如我说的,你只能一次开一辆车,但如果你的车库里有十辆,它实际上并不会给你带来更多的好处
The problems are set up so that, if you start down the right path, it should be pretty straight-forward to work it through If you start down a plausible but incorrect path, you can sometimes find yourself stuck in the weeds somewhere, and we want to bring you back in.
问题提出了,如果你从,一开始就走正确的道路,解决的途径,就一目了然了,如果你走上一条貌似正确但实际错误的道路,你会在某时某刻,发现自己陷入泥沼,于是我们就会把你拉回来。
But if you take an animal and you give it a new food and then you shock it very painfully it won't avoid the new food.
但如果你给动物吃一种新食物,然后电击它,令其感到疼痛,它仍然会进食这种食物。
But wouldn't it be nice to just have a certain period of time every day when you didn't have to even have it be ? so much as a remote possibility?
但要是每天能有一段特定的时间,死亡对你来说,甚至连一个遥远的可能性都不是,那岂不是很好?
That would be a very straightforward functional way to do it, but you could imagine that that's very labor intensive because you've got to separate each individual cell, and you've got to nurture it and then keep track and study what it becomes.
这是一种非常直截了当的有效方法,但你能想象这得耗费海量的人力,因为你得分离每一个细胞,并进行培养,然后还得追踪和研究它们的变化
They might put only 10% down on a house, so you buy a house for $300,000 and you put $30,000 down; that's an investment of $30,000 but it's highly risky because you are very leveraged when you only put 10% down.
他们也许只付了总房价的10%,若你买了30万的房子,但只交了3万,这是一笔3万元投资,但却是高风险的,只支付10%时,你的杠杆率就很高了
And so if you are a bit of a geek and would like to play net/aces with this you can go to cs50.net/aces and I don't think Willie will give it to you to keep but you can borrow and play for some amount of time in exchange for some feedback on it.
所以,如果你有兴趣并想玩玩这个,那么你可以访问cs50。,但是我觉得Willie不会让你保管它,你可以去借,然后玩一段时间,但作为交换条件,你需要反馈一些意见。
There's only one occasion where it helps to go to three dimensions because there are certain things you can do in 3D you cannot do in less than 3D.
只有一种情况下进入三维是有意义的,因为有些事情你能在三维空间内完成,但低于三维就做不到了
Is art important enough to you that you'd be prepared to watch, look at a masterpiece, if you knew that while you were enjoying it you could die, ? but that wouldn't happen otherwise?
艺术有没有重要到,让你准备好去看,去欣赏一件杰作,如果你知道在欣赏它的时候可能会死,但如果不去欣赏就不会死?
Because,indeed,they don't exist They're merely possible And we might say,you've got to exist in order for something to be bad for you But once we say that it seems we're running towards the position that in that case,death can't be bad for me because of course,when I'm dead,I don't exist ? So how can anything be bad for me?
因为他们其实并不存在,他们只是一种可能,我们由此认为你必须首先存在,某事才会让你害怕,但我们一旦这么说,我们似乎会得出这个结论,这种情况下死亡不可能让我害怕,因为我死了就不存在了,所以我怎么会害怕?
And you can very quickly take this feature to an extreme 10 and start putting X and Y and A and B and 10 and all your variables up top because it would seem to solve all of your problems and stop all of your thinking, but it's generally not a good thing.
你可能迅速地使这个特征成为一个极端,开始把X和Y和A和B和0,和所有的变量都放在最前,因为好像它可以,解决你的所有问题,并中止你的想法,但通常这不是一件好事情。
应用推荐