They are different from the groves and streams we have down here, but they don't seem necessarily to differ, I submit, in their degree of physicality.
与地上的树林和溪流不同,但在物化的程度上,我得说,它们似乎没什么不同。
Aristotle and Thomas Jefferson seem to disagree over the basic fact of human experience, whether it's equality or inequality.
亚里士多德和杰佛逊似乎对基本的,人类经历的事实有着不同看法,无论那是平等或不平等。
It's as if Richard takes those words, and he makes them his own, takes them from his father and gains a different kind of strength from them, a strength he can then use to get back at his father.
理查按父亲说的做了,就如同把父亲说的,复制于他的大脑中一样,似乎从中获得了一种,不同寻常的报复方式。
And then, I mean when I started thinking about all the people issues and doing Psychology, it was like being in the university interacting with a lot of people that it kind of occurred to me that this would be something I was interested in, and like I knew how to do it so I just did.
当我学习心理学,开始思考人与人之间的关系,就像在学习之余,去结识不同的人,似乎我对这些更感兴趣,我知道如何去做,于是我就行动了。
So this Cartesian argument seems to show us that the mind is something separate from, distinct from, not reducible to, not just a way of talking about, my body.
所以这个卡氏论证似乎给我们表明了,心灵是独立于身体,不同于身体,不能称作身体,不是"我身体"的另一种说法
And I think I understand why they expected someone different.
我似乎明白为什么他们期望不同了。
Does that sound plausible that you could see the difference?
上面两种情况听起来似乎不太一样,可你真的看到了不同吗?
It just still seems kind of different.
只是觉得似乎有点不同。
Typically again he seems to answer the question from two different points of view giving each perspective its due its justice.
很典型地,他回答问题的方式,似乎再次从两个不同的观点出发,让每种看法都有发言的机会。
Yet in another sense political philosophy is something much different than simply a subfield; it seems to be the oldest and most fundamental part of political science.
但从另一个层面来看,政治哲学,相当不同于仅单纯是次领域的学科;,它似乎是最古老且最基础的,政治科学部份。
Again, they seem to represent something quite different.
同样地,不过他们,似乎代表着十分不同的特性。
应用推荐