So, in a first blush, you might say, well, why don't we just take the first ionization energy?

当你在这个问题上第一次陷入尴尬境地的时候，你可能会说，我们为什么不取第一个电离能呢？

麻省理工公开课 - 固态化学导论课程节选

60 If we look at 435 times 160, take the square root of that, we will end up with 264 kilojoules per mole, which sensibly lies between these two values.

35乘以，取平方根，我们会得到264千焦每摩，很合理地落在两数值之间。

麻省理工公开课 - 固态化学导论课程节选

Can you understand that the mother might think it's that person even though it's really that person?

你是否能够理解,母亲也许也会认定是这个人偷取了食物,即使实际上进行偷窃的是另一个人

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

So we'll start to look at molecules and we'll see if we take two atoms and we fill in our molecular orbital and it turns out that they have more anti-bonding orbitals than bonding, that's -- a diatomic molecule we'll never see.

我们要看开始看一看分子,并且我们会发现如果我们,取两个原子并且填入分子轨道,结果是它们的反键轨道,比成键轨道更多，这就是-一个我们不会看到的二元子分子。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

I going to come back in a second to how it actually does that, but it basically says, get me x value for p 1, get me the x value for p 2, compare them, just as you would normally.

是一个类的实例,我要去取的这个实例，所关联的x值，我稍后会讲讲实际上，这里是怎么实现的，但是基本上它的意思就是，给我p1的x值。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

So, taking just the outermost electron might give us some false readings.

所以只取离中心最远的那个电子的电离能,可能会使我们的认识发生偏差。

麻省理工公开课 - 固态化学导论课程节选