-
So the distance of the gap needs to be between the outer limits of boredom and overstrain according to Iser.
因此，据伊瑟尔说，间隙的大小应该,以无聊与过劳作为外缘界限，处于两者之中。
-
We can say that Iser's position is a reconstruction of what Gadamer has, essentially, to say about the merger of horizons.
我们可以说，伊瑟尔的观点,本质上是葛达玛观点的改写，比如说视域的融合。
-
By the same token, what Iser is saying is that the space of meaning is "virtual" -this is the word he uses.
同样地，伊瑟尔说,含义所在的空间是“虚拟的“,他用的就是这个词。
-
So these are forms of the experience of reading fiction of which Iser disapproves because there's no work being done.
这就是那些阅读小说经历的形式,伊瑟尔不赞同这种形式，因为这种阅读没有任何成就。
-
It's the vocabulary, it's the complexity of the thought, and so on that makes it difficult. Iser acknowledges this.
是词汇，思想的复杂性等等,使它变得难懂，伊瑟尔承认这一点。
-
I think that the distinction Iser is making between reading and interpretation can be understood in much the same way.
我想伊瑟尔想指出的,阅读与诠释之间的差异也基本上也可以这样理解。
-
This of course brings us to the issue of "gaps" and the role that they play in the act of reading as Iser understands it.
这理所当然地把我们引到了“间隙“的问题上“,以及照伊瑟尔的理解,间隙在阅读中起到的作用。
-
People enjoy that in ways that Iser may not be fully acknowledging in this argument, but there's no question that it doesn't involve the violation of expectations.
人们很开心地看到，从某种程度上伊瑟尔可能,没有在他的论点中完全承认，但是毫无疑问,论点中并没有期望的违背。
-
As you'll see when we return to Iser after I've said a few things about Hirsch, this, as you'll see, is the fundamental difference between Gadamer and Iser.
正如你们所看到的,当我谈论了赫施的问题之后,又回到了伊瑟尔，这就是葛达玛和伊瑟尔的明显不同。
-
That is, I think, essentially the difference between what we have been talking about so far, even though there have been a variety of outlooks, and what we are talking about now.
我想这就是形式主义者,和伊瑟尔的不同了，尽管大家对于我们这堂课有很多展望，对于我们现在的学习也有很多期待。
-
It has to be a bigger distance, a broader abyss, and that's what Iser is working with in the passages I'm about to quote.
它必须是一个更大的距离，更宽的深渊，这就是伊瑟尔在我想引用的那些话里面所试图说明的。
-
In other words, whereas the New Critics and Wolfgang Iser are interested in the roughening of form, they're interested in it for hermeneutic purposes.
新批评派成员和伊瑟尔,也对形式的粗糙化感兴趣，他们对它解释学的方面感兴趣。
-
It's put in a different way by Iser, but it is in a large degree the same idea.
伊瑟尔用了不同的方法来讲述，但很大程度上说的也是同一概念。
-
Now in order to illustrate the way in which what Iser calls virtual work gets done in this regard, let me just run through a few passages quickly.
现在，为了阐释,在这点上，伊瑟尔所说的虚功是怎样做的，下面我们来快速地浏览几段话。
-
Those are the primary influences on Iser, but he himself has been tremendously influential in turn.
那些人对伊瑟尔的影响最大，但同时伊瑟尔自己的影响力也很大。
-
Iser's colleague was Hans Robert Jauss, whom we will be reading later in the course.
那时汉斯，罗伯特，姚斯是伊瑟尔的同事，你们会在之后的阅读中读到,汉斯，罗伯特，姚斯。
-
Continuing to page 1004, the upper right-hand column: xpectations"--this word is what Iser thinks governs the sort of dialectic that the reading process is playing with.
接着看1004页，右上角一栏：,“期望“，伊瑟尔认为正是这个词，“…,支配着阅读过程中的对立。
-
In other words, Iser is no more an historicist than Gadamer is but insists rather on the mutual exchange of prejudice between the two horizons in question.
换句话说就是，伊瑟尔并不比葛达玛更历史主义,但他相反却坚持在两个有争执的视域中,偏见的互换。
-
The relationship between text and reader must be a collaboration, Iser argues.
作品和读者必须是合作关系，伊瑟尔争论道。
-
Reading consists, according to Iser, in the violation of expectations.
根据伊瑟尔的观点，阅读在于期望的违背。
-
All of Iser's work is grounded in the notion of literature as fiction.
伊瑟尔的所有作品持有文学即虚构的概念。
-
That's the difference for Iser between nonfiction and fiction.
这就是伊瑟尔所说的文学与非文学之间的差别。
-
Innovation is what Iser's canon is looking for.
创造是伊瑟尔追寻的标准。
-
Iser doesn't make much of the distinction.
伊瑟尔并未十分重视这个区别。
-
So reception history has been a kind of partly theoretical, partly scholarly field, one that's really still flourishing and has been ever since the early work in the great Konstanz seminars of Iser, Jauss and others.
因此感受历史成了一个,半理论半学术的领域，在康斯坦的讨论会上,在伊瑟尔，姚斯和其他人的早期影响下,接受史一直处于繁盛期。
-
All right. Now as you read Iser you'll see immediately that in tone, in his sense of what's important, and in his understanding of the way in which we negotiate the world of texts he much more closely resembles Gadamer than Hirsch.
你们在读伊瑟尔时，立马可以感觉到,在他的语气，对重点的把握中,以及他对我们读懂文章的方法上的理解,他更像葛达玛，而不是赫施。
-
Iser's understanding of gapping the spark plug is a much more bold affirmative of the imaginative powers of the reader, a much more bold process than the hesitant conservative process suggested by Gadamer.
伊瑟尔火花塞间隙的见解,更加肯定读者的能力，比葛达玛倡导的保守程序,更加大胆。
应用推荐