If my code is correct, what should the average price be, after say, 100 days, if there's no bias. Pardon?
如果我的代码没写错的话,如果没有偏向值那平均价格会是多少呢,如果没有偏向值,请说?
I think the only difference is like they import products for cheaper, right?
我觉得唯一的区别是他们用比较便宜的价格进口商品,对吧?
If the base move is 0, then the price doesn't change So that makes sense. Interesting question.
如果这个基础位移是0,这个价格就不变,这是有道理的吗,很有意思的问题。
This is not a perfectly competitive market, but if it were, that's where price is going to end up.
这个案例的情况不是完全竞争市场,但是如果是,这个就是最终的价格
The price of the two-period bond is 1/2 and the price of the one-period bond is 1/.
所以两年期债券的价格是1/^2,一年期债券的价格则是1/
And last is cost, last is cost; hydrogen is not cheap.
最后一点是价格,最后一点是价格;,氢气不便宜。
And the telephone companies in the United State, generally about 200 billion dollars a year carrying long distance telephone conversations and they thought this conversations might be carried for free over the internet was quite shocking to them. Of course free is very low price, and they are not like it to be free.
美国的各电话公司,一般大约有每年2千亿美元,来自长途电话会话,他们认为,这些会话有可能通过互联网免费传输,对他们来说是相当震惊的,当然了,免费是很低的价格了,他们不希望它免费。
But that no particular stock is more or less likely to outperform the market, because all the information is incorporated in the price.
但是没有那一种特殊的股票是,最有可能比市场平均表现更好的,因为所有信息都是包含在价格上的。
You're going to work out what firm's demands are going to look like for each possible price they could set.
你们要解出,公司针对每一个其可能设定的价格,它的需求是什么
Now to make that lower-of-the-two-prices comment a little bit more rigorous, let's figure out what the demand actually is for these firms.
为了说明两者价格较低者,具体是什么意思,先来解决这些公司真正的需求量是什么
So if I'm Firm 1, if I produce any more quantity, what's going to happen to the price?
如果我是公司1,我要是再生产,价格会怎么变动呢
since all the information is in the current price, you don't have to worry about whether it went up or down yesterday, to decide what it's going to do today.
因为当前价格代表了所有信息,你就不需要去考虑昨天股价,是涨了还是跌了,再去判断它今天的价格会怎么变化。
The red line is the Halifax Home Price Index for greater London we're talking UK now.
红色线表示的是哈里法克斯伦敦住宅价格指数,现在说到了英国
Even if the expected value is the same, they'd move around a lot.
即使股票的价格是一样的,但是它们的价格经历很多改变。
However, then I'll have the whole market, it's as if I'm a monopolist but suddenly I'm pricing above the monopoly price, that can't be right.
但是,占有整个市场,相当于我是个垄断企业,但是我的价格却高于垄断价格,那是不正确的
OK, that it doesn't matter what the price of the stock was yesterday.
无论昨天的股价是多少,今天它的价格就是。
So, if it's $550, that makes $55,000 for a one round lot.
如果每股价格是550美元,那么一手就要花5万5千美元
You can see that the stock market has been more volatile than the earnings and the price of a share is many times higher than the earnings per share.
你可以看到,股票市场波动性大于其收益,每股价格往往是,每股收益的几倍之多
So here my best response is to price at the monopoly price.
所以这里我的最佳对策是定价在垄断价格
Economically identical, but their prices would fluctuate and fairly dramatically.
它们在经济意义上是相同的,但是他们的价格,会有波动,而且非常剧烈。
We would solve out what the monopoly price is.
我们就能解出垄断价格是什么
If your dealer quotes you a discount rate of 2.51%, you know how to convert that into the price and that's all that matters--all that really matters is the price you have to pay.
如果经销商告诉你折扣率是2.51%,你要知道如何转换成价格,真正和你有关系的,是你需要付多少钱
The general view is that if it's not extreme the rise is not too extreme it's good for the health of the economy as long as we don't have inflation that's too high.
一般的观点是如果它不极端,价格提升不太严重的话,只要我们没有太高的通货膨胀,它就对经济有好处。
It's kind of like the average price of a share adjusted for splits because you don't want the--obviously when they do a two-for-one split, the price falls in half and that's meaningless, so you want to correct for splits.
有点像经过分割调整的股票平均价格,因为你不想,当一股分割成两股,价格下跌一半,这是没意义的,所以要修正分割
The point is that in this game in which firms competed in prices, even though there were only two firms in the market, only one firm more than monopoly, we get a dramatically different result than we had last time.
重点是这个公司进行价格竞争的博弈,尽管博弈中只有两家公司,仅仅比垄断情况下多了一家,我们得到了与上次完全不同的结果
I won't bother to write it separately for Firm 2, it's going to be the quantity it sells times the price it gets for that quantity, minus that quantity it sells times the cost it incurs in producing that quantity.
我不用另外写公司2的收益了,收益是销量,乘以对应的价格,减去销量乘以产品,的生产成本
Well, one thing that goes wrong is that suppose Coke and Pepsi were able to either to write a contract or whatever to sustain joint monopoly output at this high price, this price which is actually producing positive profits in the industry it is going to turn out, therefore the price is going to be above costs.
我来说吧,问题出在这里了,假设可口可乐和百事达成了协议,不管签的是协议还是合同,只要能通过协约维持垄断产出,通过制定高价来达到正的利润就行,这样价格是高于成本的
So basically what I'm going to do here is I'm going to set my price to equal his price, minus a little bit, I'll just undercut him a little bit and by just undercutting him a little bit, I'm going to get the whole of the market and I'll make as much money as I can on those sales.
所以基本上我要做的是,设定我的价格等于他的价格,减去一点点,我的价格将仅仅比他的低一点点,并且通过比他的价格低一点点,我将占领整个市场,那些销售带给我尽可能多的钱
Well after that, the bond price went up because people saw that as a sign that the company was tightening its belt and doing things right to have money to pay off the bondholders; so it was self-interested, I suppose--maybe you can ask him about this.
在这之后,债券的价格升高了,因为人们认为降低红利是一个信号,说明公司开始紧缩开支走向正轨,并且去偿付债券持有人,莱德利夫通过这种做法达到利己的目的,我想你们可以就此事向莱德利夫提问
If P2 is actually above the monopoly price, then what's my best response in that case?
如果P2真的高于垄断价格,我的最佳对策是什么
应用推荐