• What can we say about those choices, those strategies 67 and above, bigger than 67, 68 and above?

    那些选择大于67的数的同学,如选68及以上的人怎么来评价呢

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • We know no one's going to choose 68 and above, so we can just forget them.

    我们知道没会选择68及以上的数,所以可以忽略它们

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • And my guess is the result is yes, you could but you're not going to feel un-conflicted about it and it's because these two are conflicting each other at the same time.

    我的观点是,你可以爱上两个以上的人,你可以这样做,但是你会内心很矛盾,因为这两者,一直思想一直不停地在做斗争。

    耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

  • Nevertheless, at least 90% of you chose Alpha here, and that's the right answer.

    然而90%以上的人都选了α,选α是正确的答案

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • And these aren't necessarily so incompatible but the evolutionary perspective I think would argue that you can feel that kind of love for more than one person or at least it would facilitate the passing on of your genetic material to a larger array of the next generation.

    两种观点不太相容,但是持进化论观点的认为,你可以和两个以上的人拥有完美式的爱情,至少会促进,你的基因传给更多下一代的

    耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定