So the reasons for this really enormous shift in plans, and the enormous shift in subject matter, are worth exploring.
弥尔顿的计划变化为何如此之大,他对主题的选择为何有这么大的改变,是值得探究的。
But by the time Milton begins writing his epic, he abandons his plan for a nationalistic poem, a nationalist poem, and decides instead to use the subject matter that he had been intending for that prospective tragedy, Paradise Lost.
当弥尔顿开始写史诗的时候,他放弃了原来写民族主义诗歌的计划,转而决定用他本来打算写的悲剧,《失乐园》的主题。
Or he wanted to put his effort into selling a social security plan.
或者他想努力,推行一个社保计划。
The price of Mr. Bush's final budget, which of course includes the stimulus package, may well be paid in far higher taxes " under the new president next year."
布什任期内最后一笔预算,当然也包括他的一揽子刺激计划,很可能会以高税率的形式付出代价,由下届总统来收拾这个烂摊子“
He has to modify his plans for the first couple, by barring access to the tree of life. That was not something presumably he planned to do This is in response to, perhaps, their unforeseen disobedience certainly the way the story unfolds that's how it seems to us.
他更改了他的原计划,除了不能接近生命树,这些并不是他本打算做的事情,这也许是对意外挑衅的回应,故事是对后人的警告。
What he suggested is "Manhattan-Project-type attacks upon what I consider to be the truly Big Problems of our time, not only for psychology but for all human beings " with any sense of historical urgency".
他表明“曼哈顿计划“反驳了,当时最大的问题,这不仅是对心理学,甚至对所有人类都,带来了历史紧迫感。
So he took the financial plans of the conservative Government that was then in power, five years ahead, and he said these are my financial plans, I'm going to announce these today as my financial plans five years ahead.
所以他就用了当时执政的,保守党的财政计划,作为未来五年的财政计划公布给民众,他说这些计划就是他的执政计划,我现在就宣布,这是未来五年的财政计划
The interesting thing is, actually everyone calls it the Paulson proposal, but it was apparently mostly written by a young man who is in his early thirties You may not consider that young but I think that is young.
有趣的是,虽然每个人都称那个改革为鲍尔森计划,但很明显这个计划大部分是由一个青年男子写的,他才刚刚30岁,也许你们不认为30岁很年轻,但是我觉得是。
Nowhere in his statement to that find the word "stimulus package".
他并没有提到“一揽子刺激计划“这个词。
And Abraham's reaction comes as something of a surprise. He objects to the plan, and he starts to argue with God. "Will you sweep away the innocent along with the guilty? Shall not the judge of all the earth justly?" That's in Genesis 18:23-25. The question is of course rhetorical.
亚伯拉罕的反应时一种惊奇,他反对,这个计划,他开始与上帝争论,“无论善恶,你都要剿灭吗?审判全地的主岂能不行公义么?“,这在,《创世纪》第18章第23至25章,这个问题当然是夸张的。
It was in 1995, a secretary at IBM Corporation was asked to xerox some documents by her boss and the documents described a proposed takeover of Lotus Corporation.
那是在1995年,IBM的一个秘书,帮他老板复印一份文件,文件有关,IBM计划收购莲花公司的计划
应用推荐