Hirsch was engaged in lifelong disagreement with Gadamer but he was a student of Wimsatt, the author of "The Intentional Fallacy."
赫施一生都不同意葛达玛的观点,但他是温姆斯特的学生,温姆斯特是《意图谬论》的作者之一“
I have a friend who lives in SoMa, south of market, so couple of blocks away, and he's...
我有一位朋友住在超市南边的苏玛区,离这里差不多有两个街区,他……
He also plainly shares with Gadamer the assumption, the supposition, that the construal of meaning cannot be altogether objective.
他同时也坦率地表示自己和葛达玛,有一样的设想,那就是意思的解读并不都是客观的。
Judah had Perez and Zerah from Tamar."
犹大从他玛氏生法勒斯和谢拉“
It would seem that the Elder Brother and his sister were way too optimistic in their assessment of the protected status of the virtuous poet and the protected status of the virgin, the favored role of the poet. Virginity does nothing.
似乎《科玛斯》中哥哥和他的妹妹认为,贞洁的诗人,未失童真的诗人自然会受到保护,的想法太过乐观了,贞洁无能为力。
Well, there's a story-- there's a long story in the Mahabarahta about an emperor called Nala and he had a wife named Damayanti and he was a very pure and very good person.
有那么一个故事,在摩诃婆罗多一书中有篇长故事,有关一个名叫那勒的国王,他有个妻子叫妲玛言狄,他是个非常纯洁善良的人
In other words, Iser is no more an historicist than Gadamer is but insists rather on the mutual exchange of prejudice between the two horizons in question.
换句话说就是,伊瑟尔并不比葛达玛更历史主义,但他相反却坚持在两个有争执的视域中,偏见的互换。
In any case, in this footnote Gadamer says something-- I think it's very rare that we can actually just sort of outright disagree with Gadamer, but he says something in this footnote that I believe we can actually disagree with.
无论如何,在此脚注中葛达玛提到一些东西-,我想我们不可能,彻底赞同葛达玛的观点,但在他的脚注中提到了一些,我很赞同的观点。
Now how then does he differ from Gadamer?
那他的观点和葛达玛的有什么不同呢?
Gadamer acknowledges this, even insists on it as I say, but he doesn't lay stress on it because the gap that is implied in the need to be pulled up short is not a big one.
葛达玛承认,甚至坚持这点,正如我所说的,但他并不强调这个,因为“突然停下“所暗含的缺口,并不大。
We implicitly demand of expository texts," he goes on to say -and he may be alluding to Gadamer here because after all Gadamer is talking primarily about expository text, works of philosophy, works of social thought, which of course aren't trying to surprise or trick us.
我们暗中希望能得到解释的文本“,他接着说下去,而且他可能在这里提到葛达玛,因为毕竟葛达玛主要研究解释性作品,哲学作品,社会思想作品,这些当然不会试图去令我们惊讶或者是误导我们。
This is Comus, line 588 -- the Elder Brother. The brother says: Virtue may be assail'd but never hurt, Surpris'd by unjust force but not enthrall'd, Yea even that which mischief meant most harm Shall in the happy trial prove most glory.
这是《科玛斯》,第588行--哥哥这个角色,他说:,诗歌大意:,贞操或许遭袭,却不会受损,或许为不义之力突袭,却不会乱了阵脚,是的,对于贞操最重的伤害也不过是玩笑,考验只是证明它无上的荣光。
All right. Now as you read Iser you'll see immediately that in tone, in his sense of what's important, and in his understanding of the way in which we negotiate the world of texts he much more closely resembles Gadamer than Hirsch.
你们在读伊瑟尔时,立马可以感觉到,在他的语气,对重点的把握中,以及他对我们读懂文章的方法上的理解,他更像葛达玛,而不是赫施。
They forget to reverse Comus' wand when they rush in to his lair.
当他们冲到科玛斯居所的时候忘记改变他棒子的方向了。
应用推荐