So consent has come up a lot and here in John Locke, we have one of the great philosophers of consent.
同意出现频率之高,本课将讲到约翰·洛克,最伟大的哲学家之一,他对同意的看法。
Who would speak here in defense of Locke or make sense, find a way out of this predicament?
谁愿意为洛克辩护,或帮他摆脱这个困境?
Now these worries were raised by John Locke the great British philosopher, and he thought, this is too big a pill to swallow.
这是约翰·洛克提出的,他是伟大的英国哲学家,他认为,这个问题太大。
And yet for others, he opened the door to John Locke and the liberal theory of government.
对其他人而言,他却为洛克的思想,以及政府自由主义理论开创了先河。
The subject of the debate has been the nature of the fallen angels' political future: essentially, the question is where do we go from here? Moloch, you'll remember, is the military general who will risk absolutely anything for revenge.
辩论的主题是,堕落天使政治前途的本来面目:,关键问题在于,我们从这里要走向何方?,你们记得莫洛克吧,他是一位将军,愿不惜一切代价复仇。
Well, I mean, just to defend Locke, he does say that there are some times in which you can't take another person's land.
要为洛克辩护的话,他的确说到了,几种情况下,你不能掠夺他人的土地。
If it's a bad argument, then Locke's given us a mere rationalization that isn't morally defensible.
如果他的观点是错的,那么洛克的辩护,只是看似合理,但在道义上站不住脚。
Rock believed in souls, he just didn't think they were the key to personal identity.
洛克相信灵魂论,但他认为,这并不是人格统一性的关键。
You want some textual support for your view, for your reading of Locke, Ben?
需要我举出他原文里的材料来支持你的观点,支持你对洛克的解读吗,本?
Well, Locke tells us where it comes from and he gives two answers.
洛克告诉了我们它的来源,他给了我们两个答案。
Does Locke have a way out of this or is he basically sanctioning an all-powerful government, despite everything he says about unalienable rights?
洛克对此能自圆其说吗,还是说他其实是支持万能政府的呢,尽管他说了那么多什么不可剥夺的权利?
He borrows it from an earlier philosopher, John Locke.
他借鉴了另一位更早期的哲学家,约翰·洛克。
It actually, it's been shown, seems to foreshadow the political philosophy of Milton's much younger contemporary, John Locke -- the notion that nature demands that every human individual has just enough, is given just enough to be self-sufficient.
事实上这一论点似乎提前预兆了,比弥尔顿年轻许多的同代人,他们的政治哲学,约翰·洛克--他认为自然要求,每个自然人拥有足够自己使用的,每个人只得到足够自给的就够了。
Because if you are right that this would justify the taking of land in North America from Native Americans who didn't enclose it, if it's a good argument, then Locke's given us a justification for that.
因为如果你是对的,洛克此举将正义化从印第安人手中占领,他们尚未圈定的土地这一行为,如果他的观点是正确的,那么洛克给出了占领土地的正当理由。
应用推荐