And he says, I don't, "No one really knows where the Nile River starts."
他说,“我不,没人真的知道尼罗河的源头到底在哪里。”
Remember when we were talking about pushing the fat man off the bridge, someone said, "But he didn't agree to sacrifice himself.
还记得第一讲谈到的,把胖子推下桥的例子,有人就说,但他没同意去牺牲自己啊。
He doesn't name the swan, just as he doesn't name the "rough beast" in "The Second Coming."
他没说这天鹅叫什么,就如在《三贤》《第二次降临》,他也没说粗鄙的野兽的名字“
He said "Steve, you don't get it. We're going to put a computer on every desk, in every home. You didn't drop out of business school to be the bookkeeper of a 30 person company."
他说“史蒂夫,你还没尽力呢,我们要让电脑进入每桌每户,你从商学院辍学又不是为了,给一个只有30人的公司当图书管理员的“
An hour later he was gone--still gone and it was around the corner.
结果他去了一个小时还没回来,照理说早该回到了。
And I shouldn't just say he here of course, I mean this is he or she but if I get that wrong going on, please forgive me for it.
我不应该只说他,应该说他或她,如果我以后又没注意,请大家多多包涵
Yes, but predicting what he does versus what Clinton will do or Bush is a bit too much noise Nobody would have predicted George Bush So Bill Clinton was right, voting for Barack Obama would be a roll of the dice?
我倒是想,但是要预测他的政策,比起预测克林顿,或者布什,太不靠谱了,当时谁又会想到乔治·布什是这样的总统呢,这么说,看来比尔·克林顿没说错,他说,给奥巴马投票等于在赌运气,是吗?
And here's the thing; the idea is to drink as much as you can without passing out and at the end of Plato's Symposium everybody is out, except for Socrates who looks around and says, "oh well no more conversation everybody's asleep."
所以,飨宴的目的是,让你在开怀痛饮的同时,又不至于醉得不省人事,在柏拉图飨宴的最后大家都醉倒了,除了苏格拉底,他看着周围说,"好的,都没话说了,大家都睡着了"
But equally true,and more surprisingly, from the personality theory point of view, there's no reason to say that I'm Shelly Kagan and he's not.
但同样真实,并更让人惊讶的是,从人格理论的角度来看,也没理由说我是Shelly,Kagan而他不是。
We are all rational actors and therefore it is rational for us to seek and to desire peace, but note that that is exactly what Hobbes does not say, he does not say this.
我们的行为都合乎理性,所以我们去寻找和平,但是要注意,霍布斯确实没提到这一点,他并没有说。
Is there something on his mind that he's not saying?
是不是还有些东西他想说而没写?
If we responded to all fires, he said, there would be no incentive to subscribe.
他说,如果我们见火就扑,那就没人会订我们的服务了。
Does he not say that armed prophets always win, the unarmed prophets lose? Did he not say that he wrote to reveal the effectual truth of things and ? not just what people have imagined the case to be?
难道他没说过武装的先知总能取胜而,徒手的先知总是失败?,难道他没说过,他写作是为了揭示出事物的本来面目,证明事物并非人们幻想的那个样子?
应用推荐