-
And he defined the average in terms of not the sum divided by two, but he chose the geometric mean.
鲍林定义平均并不是,简单相加在除以二，他选择几何平均。
-
The Romer scale was, Romer was a Dane, and he defined freezing of water at 7.5 degrees Roemer, and 22.5 degrees Romer as blood-warm.
他的罗默温标，定义水的冰点,是7。5，罗默度，温血的温度是22。5，罗默度。
-
Back to our hypothetical, you know, our initial discussion of Flaming Hot Cheetos: by his definition that would not qualify as food.
再回过头来谈谈我们之前的假定,我们曾讨论过关于火焰辣奇多的问题,按照他的定义,奇多不能算作食物
-
That's Gadamer's position, and it is the position of anyone who opposes that of Hirsch, although what he means by the distinction is clear enough.
那是葛达玛的观点，也是所有赫施反对者的观点，虽然他对区别的定义已经够明显了。
-
And it is here that Machiavelli introduces his famous distinction between armed and unarmed prophets.
也就在这个论点上,马奇亚维利推出他的著名区别定义,介于武装与非武先知之间。
-
So maybe by invisible he should have moved to this stronger, bolder definition of invisible.
所以无形的含义他应该转移到了,这个更有力更大胆的定义上来。
-
He tries to define what that might be.
他试图为这个概念做出定义。
-
Yeats once said that he wanted the natural words in the natural order, but he had a very highly cultured sense of what is natural, and his poetry is full of verbal archaism.
叶芝曾说他想让自然的话语,用自然的方式呈现，但对于,自然的定义他又将其高度文化化，他的诗歌有很多口语的古语表达。
-
By definition,he necessarily lives in society.
按照定义,他必然生活在社会中
-
He rejects the idea that the city is defined simply by a group of people who inhabit a common territory the same space as it were.
他拒绝将城市简单定义为,一群人住在同一领土上的概念,即同一空间。
-
That was his definition.
那就是他的定义。
-
But he is also defining a kind of school.
但他也定义了一种学派。
-
He accepts the view that justice is giving to each what is owed, but he interprets this to mean that justice means doing good to your friends and harm to your enemies.
他接受,正义是给予每个人其所应得的观点，但他的诠译是,将正义定义为善待你的朋友,严惩你的敌人。
-
Rather, he redefines it.
相对地，他重新加以定义。
-
The person who does that best is Michael Pollan, and when you read his book, In Defense of Food, he spends some time in the book defining what food is and working through this--this quagmire of how do we define food and what's acceptable to eat, what's socially acceptable, what's personally acceptable.
这一点上迈克尔·伯伦做得最好,你们可以看看他写的书《为食物辩护》,他在书中给食物下了定义,并深入地探讨了这个难题,即如何区分食物与能吃的东西,社会普遍接受的东西,个人能够接受的东西
-
In every regime one of these groups he says will be the dominant class will be the dominant body the ruling body as he says in that definition and that ruling body will in turn he says define the nature of the regime.
他说，在每一个政体之中,这些类组中的一类将会是统治阶级,支配本体，统治本体,如他所说，在那样的定义之下,统治本体将会相对地定义政体的本质。
应用推荐