• Hirsch was engaged in lifelong disagreement with Gadamer but he was a student of Wimsatt, the author of "The Intentional Fallacy."

    赫施一生都不同意葛达玛的观点,但是温姆斯特的学生,温姆斯特是《意图谬论》的作者之一“

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

  • so he basically said I can't go to school in California.

    所以基本上不同意我去加州上学。

    洛杉矶和纽约不一样 - SpeakingMax英语口语达人

  • So consent has come up a lot and here in John Locke, we have one of the great philosophers of consent.

    同意出现频率之高,本课将讲到约翰·洛克,最伟大的哲学家之一,同意的看法。

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • Shklovsky disagreed and he decided to advance a completely different point of view.

    什克洛夫斯基不同意,决定发展一个全新的理论。

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

  • If we grant that to Plato, he thinks we've got an argument for the immortality of the soul.

    如果我们同意柏拉图这个观点,认为我们就有了支持灵魂不灭性的论据

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • If I want my kid to do something, I should say yes one out of every ten times.

    如果我想肯定孩子的某种行为,我就应该在的每十次提议中同意一次。

    耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

  • Did you go along with his policies, or did you try to persuade him and change his mind?

    同意的政策,还是说服改变主意?

    普林斯顿公开课 - 国际座谈会课程节选

  • Nabokov cannot meet his reader on the misty mountain ; because somebody has to agree to publish this book first; it has to exist in the world before that reader can meet it.

    然而纳博科夫却不能在这座巅峰上与的读者相遇,因为在那之前必须有人先同意出版那本书;,在读者遇到那座山峰之前,它必须首先存在。

    耶鲁公开课 - 1945年后的美国小说课程节选

  • First of all, he accepted our invitation to go to lunch with some of you.

    首先,接受了我们的邀请,同意和部分同学共进午餐

    耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

  • Similarly, he denies that slavery is always or only appropriate for non-Greeks.

    同样地,同意奴役永远,或仅会是非希腊人。

    耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

  • So Socrates has what he wants, once we give him premise number two, that the eternal, non-physical can only be grasped by the eternal, non-physical.

    所以如果我们同意的前提二,苏格拉底就得到了想要的,前提二说永恒,非现实的事物,只能被永恒,非现实的事物认知

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • On the one hand, he says the government can't take your property without your consent.

    一方面,说,未经你同意,政府不能取走你的财产。

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • So if he came up with the idea, that's the only kind of consent we could have confidence in morally then it would be okay.

    所以如果是自己提出的,除非是在这种情况下的同意,才能确信说,道德上没问题。

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • It might be improved by presenting other views better and more objectively, since Kagan always ended a particular line of reasoning by defeating the argument if he didn't agree with it.

    讲课效果会提升如果更好的,并更客观的展示其观点,因为卡刚通常通过击败一个论点,来结束特定的推理,如果同意它。

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • One possibility is indeed to just agree with him,right?

    一种可能性是同意,对不对?

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • Remember when we were talking about pushing the fat man off the bridge, someone said, "But he didn't agree to sacrifice himself.

    还记得第一讲谈到的,把胖子推下桥的例子,有人就说,但同意去牺牲自己啊。

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • Otherwise,it would be kind of coerced consent under the circumstances,you think.

    否则,考虑到当时情况,可能是被迫同意的。

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • He agrees that it's theft. He's more demanding than Joe.

    他同意这是盗窃,而且比乔苛刻。

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • I think that he says that it's kind of implied consent.

    说的是,这是某种默认的同意

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • It would be different if he consented."

    如果他同意就是另一回事了“

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • So the real question is how does he himself figure it out between " "I agree to give up my life, give up my property" when he talks about taxes or military conscription for the fact.

    所以真正的问题是,如何能自圆其说以下观点,“我同意放弃我的生命,放弃我的财产“,当谈到税收制或征兵制时是这样说的。

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • Locke says that legitimate government is government founded on consent and who, nowadays, would disagree with him?

    洛克说合法政府是建立在同意的基础上,而现如今又有谁会不同意的观点呢?

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • The worry gets raised by Cebes who says even if we grant the soul is nearly indestructible, that's not good enough to get us immortality.

    赛贝斯提出了的担心,说,即使我们同意灵魂几乎不可摧毁,也不足以让我们不朽。

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • And some consider the White House Chief of Staff as co-president, although I think Joshua disagrees with that, or the president's gatekeeper, that is, I think he agrees.

    一些人认为,办公厅主任可以和总统平起平坐,虽然我认为约书亚不同意此观点,还有人说是总统的看门人,我认为这种说法同意

    普林斯顿公开课 - 国际座谈会课程节选

  • Now, if Parker did give his consent, would it be all right, do you think or not?

    那如果派克的确同意了,你觉得杀是正当的吗?

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • But still, it must be with his own consent, I.E. The consent of the majority, " giving it either by themselves, or through their representatives."

    但是这仍须得到自己的同意,即得到大多数的同意,由们自己或选出的代表所表示的大多数同意

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • David Smith So,of course,we can all agree David Smith, despite thinking he's Napoleon,is not Napoleon.

    因此,显然我们能够一致同意,尽管认为自己是拿破仑,但不是。

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • I'm wondering if Dudley and Steven had asked for Richard Parker's consent in you know, dying, if that would exonerate them from an act of murder and if so, is that still morally justifiable?

    我想知道达德利和斯蒂芬斯,是否征得过派克的同意,取的性命,是否那样就能赦免们的谋杀罪名,是否这样,道德上就是正当的?

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • Then there are some who say the real problem here is the lack of consent, whether the lack of consent to a lottery, to a fair procedure or, Kathleen's idea, lack of consent at the moment of death.

    还有人认为,真正的问题在于,没有征得同意,不管是没有征得同意抽签,用公平程序进行,或者是凯思琳所说,没有征得派克的同意

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定