Any thoughts? Don't you hate professors who stand here waiting for you to answer, even when they have candy?
你们难道不讨厌站在那儿等你回答问题,的教授么?虽然他有糖果做奖品哦,用少于线性时间完成可能么?
He should have said that you know what, harmony is not really invisible or can't be destroyed.
他应该说,知道么,和声并不是真的无形,并不是不可毁灭。
Anyway, you can see that in this passage on page 722, Gadamer is describing the circularity of our reading, and he's describing it in a way that may raise certain concerns for us.
无论如何,大家可以在722页上看到,伽达默尔描述了我么阅读的循环,他描述这种循环的方式可能会引起我们的关注。
See all the scribbles? This was hard for him.
看见了么?,对他来说很艰难。
Now I look at that element. Is it the thing I'm looking for? If I'm really lucky, it is. If not, I look at the value of that point here and the thing I'm looking for. And for sake of argument let's assume that the thing I'm looking for is smaller than the value here.
现在我们瞧瞧指向的元素,它是我们找的值么?如果足够幸运,他就是,如果不是,我们比较指向的元素,同我们要找的元素,方便起见,假设要找的元素比这里的值要小。
Any Cramerites? Nobody?
任何他的节目?没有人么?
So did you approach Professor Katz and say "we have this idea we really would like to promote"? At least a discussion and the academic study of what it looks like.
那你是主动联系Katz教授,跟他说,我有这样一个想法,我们很想推行么?,至少讨论,并且做了学术上的研究,了解课程的内容。
Can we say why it hasn't broken down?
我们能解释他为什么没有分裂么
The unsorted, and you have exactly the point I want to get to-- how come all the guys, sorry, all the people answering questions are way, way up in the back? Wow. that's a Tim Wakefield pitch right there, all right. Thank you.
所有的同学,抱歉,所有的人们都是这么回答的,扔到后面,哇,这是一个Tim,Wakefield式的投掷啊,谢谢!,他完全正确,不是么?这比这小么?
应用推荐