and it, probably...if you were to look at everything carefully,
如果你仔细地看所有的东西的话,
There are so few words that you can be sure that they were chosen with care. You'll be looking at Genesis 22 closely in your section discussions.
几乎没有一个词你可以确定含义,它们的选定都是经过仔细,推敲的,你们将在讨论阶段更详细地看《创世纪》第22章。
In fact, if we model this more carefully, we'll get roughly the same prediction either way.
实际上,如果我们更仔细地设定此模型,我们也将得到同样的结论
So, let's take a look at one of these rows in more detail to think about why this might be happening, and it turns out the reason that these glitches occur are because the sub shell structure predominates in certain instances, and that's where these glitches take place.
那么,让我们仔细地看一看其中一行,想一想为什么会这样,结果是这些小偏差的出现,是因为在一定情况下,亚壳层结构会产生重要影响,这正发生在小偏差出现的地方。
All right. Let's look at this again more carefully.
我们再把这个论证更仔细地看一遍
You have to read Fabozzi et al.
你们需要重新仔细地再阅读一遍。
You must learn to read closely.
你们必需要学着仔细地阅读。
I'll describe more about that later.
待会我会更仔细地描述
And the whole publishing industry was very careful to keep those or some, were very careful to keep those separate and how they will be managed. That was called separation of churching state. But when we began publishing on the internet, we discovered a new kind of content which are called community content.
整个出版产业十分小心,地保持着它们或者其中一些,非常仔细地保持,它们是分开以及如何管理它们,那被,称为政教分离,但是当我们,开始在互联网上出版,我们发现一种,新内容,交错社区内容。
Gives you a little sense of Hobbes' spirit, his humor, the wry wit that becomes apparent on almost every page of this book, but you have to be a careful reader.
这体现了一部分霍布斯的精神,他的幽默感,他的诙谐风趣,而这些也明显体现在他的每一页书里,你们必须非常仔细地读。
If you start to look at food labels more carefully, what you'll find is some version of sugar, and if you find ose, o-s-e at the end of something, that means it's a sugar.
如果你更仔细地看看食品标签,你会找到许多类型的糖,如果你找到词缀"ose",以ose结尾的单词,那说明这是糖类
So the best response for Player 1, as a function of what Player 2 chooses, q2, is just equal to the q1 hat in this expression and if I solve that out carefully, I will no doubt make a mistake, but let's try it.
这个就是参与人1的最佳对策,它是参与人2策略q2的一个函数,它和之前的q1帽那个表达式是相等的,虽然我是很仔细地计算的,还是有可能算错的,我来验证一下
应用推荐