But, in economic terms, there's no difference between losing the tickets and losing $400, so why do you behave differently?

但是，从经济学角度上看,丢了票和丢了400美元没有什么不同，但你为何会做出不同的反应呢？

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

One reason this game is interesting from the point of view of economics, is this game lies between the two extreme cases that you learn about in your Intro Economics class.

从经济学角度看,这之所以有趣,是因为这个博弈介于,经济学导论的两种极端情况之间

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So economically it meant more-- it made more sense to eat meat under those circumstances, but of course the meat didn't exist in all places of the world, so some people were dependent on plants.

因此,从经济角度看,在那样的环境中,食肉更加合理,当然肉类并不是世界各地到处都有,因此,有些人们就依赖于农作物

耶鲁公开课 - 关于食物的心理学、生物学和政治学课程节选

On the other hand--and this is something that I want to emphasize-- you don't want to carry that too far and one of the lessons of behavioral finance is that markets are not really efficient in a global sense.

而另一方面,我想强调的是...,不要认为这就是真理,行为经济学中的一课就说,从全球的角度看,市场并非全然是有效的

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选