I'm going to rather gruesomely not realign science-fictioning story, I'm going to torture one of the two in products.
我不打算给你们设计,什么科幻故事了,我打算去折磨案例中的某个人。
Are you familiar with the story? Do you know what happens? Yeah?
你熟悉这个故事吗?你知道会发生些什么吗?嗯?
What does that mean? God is just a toy? God is a children's story?
这是什么意思?,上帝是个玩具?,上帝是个儿童故事?
In other words, how is it that we feel the need to make things up?
换句话说,究竟是什么使我们想编故事?
That also encouraged me to really write more and to really think about what is the story, how are people coming to this and like when I show my friends this, how are they going to react.
这也鼓励我编写更多东西,并且真正思考这个故事是什么,思考人们怎么想它,比如我向我的朋友展示的时候,他们会怎么反应。
He is dung depending on which story you listen to.
或是粪便,这取决于你听到的是什么故事
So, what's the moral of the story?
这个故事有什么寓意?
Then on the other hand, at the other extreme, you have scholars who see the patriarchal stories as entirely fabricated retrojections of a much later age. And they vary significantly as to when they think these stories were written: anywhere from the period of the monarchy all the way down to the fourth century, some of them.
另一方面又是另一个极端,有学者认为族长故事完全是后世编造的,这样一来,对这些故事是什么时候写的,也有巨大的分歧:,其中一些人认为是在从君主制时期,到公元4世纪之间的某段时候。
In the arts generally people who teach you the arts are going to shudder if you would say oh I interesting in this because it's such fun, because it tells you what life is like or tells you a story and then you'll repeat the story.
艺术一般来说,如果你对教你们艺术的人,说,哦,我对这个很感兴趣,因为它很有趣,因为它告诉你生活是什么,或说它告诉了你一个很好的故事,他会很震惊。
If there's something worse about story number two, and I think it's pretty clear there is something worse, it's not the separation.
第二个故事又有什么更坏的地方呢,显而易见是有更坏的地方,不是分离本身。
And this is actually, in general, why it's sometimes difficult to teach or to tell stories because we constantly overestimate how much other people know.
概而论之,这就是为什么有时候我们很难能讲一个故事,因为我们总是认为别人什么都猜到了。
So the question for us remains, which deeply challenged readers in Hobbes' own time, what makes Hobbes' story, as I am calling it, his story about the state of nature ? being a condition of war, what makes it plausible?
所以我们的问题依然存在,这使霍布斯时代的读者感到深深的挑战,是什么使得霍布斯的故事,关于自然状态的故事,战争状态的故事,是什么使它真实合理?
So this is kind of a modern show and that is kind of a retro language and it's also as will be one of the takeaways of this course completely irrelevant to what problem you are solving, the fact that this engineer is using--proclaiming to use Visual Basic really is not a compelling part of the story.
这看起来很时髦,像是重新流行的语言,当然,该语言是我们学习这门课程,过程中附带着要学习的,这与解决什么问题无关,事实上,使用VB真的不是,这个故事出彩的地方。
I actually thought it was hard to understand, just what was happening, the action part of the story. It might have been that I read it too quickly. Uh huh. Harder than "Menelaiad" to understand? No.
事实上,我认为它很难理解,就是到底发生了什么,即故事中的动作部分,也可能是我读得太快的缘故,所以不太理解罢,比《梅尼洛斯》更难懂吗,不是的。
So what I want to do today is look closely first at the selections from Black Boy that I asked you to read and to look at those as a text and to ask ourselves what kind of story it is.
它们细微的差别,我先读部分《黑孩子》,先前我布置给大家去阅读,并思考几个问题,我发现了什么,故事是什么类型。
Of course, they won't be perfect, there's a mixed character of the world of Homer, but still, if you look at the world of Odysseus, his home, what's going on in Ithaca, there are some valuable clues.
当然,并不是完美的答案,荷马史诗里写了一些只言片语,如果你继续阅读《奥德赛》里面的故事,在他的家乡伊萨卡岛发生了什么,你会找到很多有用的线索
We assume that unless we're dealing with Scheherazade, it has to have an end, but at the same time we might well ask ourselves, why does it have a middle? What is the function of the middle with respect to a beginning and an end?
而且我们认定一定会有结尾,除非讲故事的是那个,《天方夜谭》中的苏丹新娘,但是我们要问自己了,为什么故事一定要有经过呢?,故事的经过对于开头结尾来说起到什么作用呢?
应用推荐