The two accounts are extremely different but they both Signal the unique position and dignity of the human being.
这两种描述是截然不同的,但是它们都,表明了人类特有的地位和尊严。
And what human rights law making keeps coming back to is the human being, human dignity, the essence of the human.
而且人权法总是要回归到,人类本身,人的尊严,人的本质。
The world is good; humans are important; They have purpose and dignity.
世界很美好,人类很重要;,他们有目的和尊严。
It is a moral entitlement for Hobbes, the source of human worth and dignity.
对霍布斯来说是一种道德权利,是人类价值和尊严的源泉。
And I found there were very few philosophers to even touch that topic, it was just something that they just assumed that somehow, yes, of course all humans have dignity and moral status and rights.
我发现很少有哲学家,研究这一问题,他们只是理所当然的假设,是的,全体人类都有,尊严,有道德标准,也有自己的权利。
We have very different understandings of what we mean about the inherent human dignity when we bring in our, I mean, in my sense, particularly religious understandings.
使我们产生了各种不同的理解,比如对人类固有尊严含义的不同理解,在我看来,尤其是我们加入自己的,宗教理解时。
So they are trying to take the criteria that are already well established and human rights and saying we need to look again at what is torture, we need to look at imprisonment we need to look at all sorts of things related to human dignity.
如此一来,他们就在挑战,那些已经确立好的标准,以及人权法的内容,要求大家重新审视“酷刑“的定义,重新审视“监禁“的定义,还有所有与人类尊严相关的事物,还有所有与人类尊严相关的事物。
And when we begin to speak about the human being and human dignity, people with religious identification quickly find themselves talking about concepts that have an element of sacred to them.
当我们开始谈论人类,和人的尊严,信仰宗教的人,很快会发现自己在谈论那些,对他们有着神圣意义的概念。
But now you will suggest, I've really gone too far, attributing to Hobbes a doctrine of human dignity that one might expect to find in a philosopher like Kant or someone else.
但是你会说,我真的跑题了,把一切都归于霍布斯关于人类尊严的教条,你可能期待一个像,康德一样的哲学家。
What constitutes the ground of human dignity?
什么是人类尊严的组成基础?
应用推荐