The charges against him were: corrupting the young and disbelieving in the Gods that the city believes in.
罪名是:,腐化青少年与,亵渎神明,雅典城所信奉的神明。
At a minimum we would think the charge of impiety suggests disrespect of the gods.
至少,我们可以将,亵渎神明想成是对神明的不敬。
Sacrifice was offered only on pilgrimage to Jerusalem, which meant that slaughter of animals for meat in the countryside no longer has a sacral component to it. It's just ordinary, common, profane slaughter.
献祭只有在到耶路撒冷朝圣才能进行,这意味着,在乡下宰杀动物取肉不在有,神圣的元素它只是普通的,常见的,亵渎神明的宰杀。
From this point of view I want to say ? was Socrates guilty of impiety?
从这个观点看来,我想说的是,苏格拉底亵渎神明有罪吗?
He is, after all, on trial for his life, for the charge of impiety.
他可是在接受生死攸关的审判,罪名是亵渎神明。
But this seems quite removed doesn't it from the Socrates who is brought up on charges of corrupting the young and the impiety.
但这看似大相径庭,不是吗,有别于苏格拉底,那个,被控腐化青少年,亵渎神明的人。
Does this policy of principled disobedience, you might say vindicate or indict Socrates of the charge of corruption and impiety ? that has been brought against him?
这种原则性反抗的策略,可说是证明,或判定苏格拉底,腐化与亵渎神明,罪名的证据吗?
What could impiety have meant ? to his audience and his contemporaries?
这类公民罪行的意义到底为何,亵渎神明对他的观众及当代人的意义为何?
Impiety and corruption ? in what sense are these civic offenses?
亵渎神明与腐化,这两个罪名词汇的意义究竟为何?
It is this Socrates who is brought up on charges of corruption and impiety yet none of this quite answers the question of what is the nature of Socrates' crime.
这是被控腐化,与亵渎神明的苏格拉底,但这都未能完整地回答,苏格拉底所背罪名的本质究竟为何。
应用推荐