But the mere fact that they would change your behavior doesn't yet tell you whether they're reason-generating facts.

但仅仅是它们会改变你的行为这个事实,并没有告诉你它们是否是产生原因的事实。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Possibility number two is the facts change your behavior by giving you a reason to behave differently.

第二种可能是事实改变了你的行为,通过给了你一个改变行为的理由。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

But I suspect that that's probably a little bit too quick, because really there are two different ways in which facts could influence our behavior.

但我怀疑也许这有点太快了，因为事实上有两种方式,事实可以影响我们的行为。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

So the facts could be things that would give you reason to change your behavior.

所以事实可能会给你理由,改变你的行为。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

On the one hand, it could be that certain facts, if you knew them, would cause you to behave differently without actually giving you any reason to behave differently.

一方面，可能有某些事实，如果你知道了它们，会导致你的行为不同,但并没有真正地给你改变行为的理由。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

A bold claim would say, "The facts about death, if I thought about them, would change my behavior, but not because it would give me a reason to change my behavior-- " simply because it would influence my behavior."

一个大胆的观点会认为，“关于死亡的事实，如果我考虑了它们，就会改变我的行为，但不是因为它给了我改变行为的理由-,只是因为它影响了我的行为“

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

If these are facts about how Peggy Sue likes to kiss and tell, or then goes around and talks about who's a good kisser and who's a bad kisser, maybe that gives you a reason to not continue what you're doing.

如果这些是关于Peggy，Sue如何喜欢接吻并告诉，或者然后到处去谈论谁是接吻高手,谁接吻很烂的事实的话，也许那就给了你一个不再继续你此时行为的理由。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选