So by that definition, maybe they didn't have fences ... around little plots of land but didn't... They were using it.
按照这个定义,也许他们是没有在,那小块地上围上篱笆,但并不意味着。,他们在使用该土地。
Because your store might not do so good, if you just first open and no one has ever heard of you,
因为你的商店也许会没那么好。如果你是第一次开店,没有人听说过你的话,
It is always probably the case that when I speak I won't choose just any word.
也许事实是,我说话的时候并没有特意选择任何词语。
It might not have any electrons in it, but it still exists, so you need to draw these into your molecular orbital diagram.
也许它里面没有电子,但它是存在的,所以你需要在分子轨道图里画出来。
If they're mere causes and not reasons, then maybe it's perfectly okay to disregard them.
如果它们仅是导致而非是原因,那么也许无视它们完全没有问题。
The libertarian says it may be a good thing if people wear seatbelts but that should be up to them and the state, the government, has no business coercing them, us, to wear seatbelts by law.
自由主义者说,系安全带也许是件好事,但这应由人们自己作主,政府没有资格,用法律来强迫人们系安全带。
So, it is from the beginning a society in which the community is a critical element, maybe the critical element, an individual who didn't live in a society could not achieve the kinds of glory and fame,and recognition that you expect from a hero.
所以,它最初是这样一个社会,在这个社会中,集体是一个关键性元素,也许是唯一的关键性元素,一个没有社会生活的个人是得不到,荣誉,名望,赏识,这些英雄们才能拥有的东西的
You could put everything on this line, I think there may be, I'm not really allowed to do this on this model, the one thing I can't do is, part of the truth is that Bud Light might be down here somewhere but I'm not allowed to do that.
你可以把任何东西放在这条线上,我想那也许是,我实际上并没有权利在这个模型中这么做,我不能做的是,起码百威淡啤酒应该在这上的某个位置,但我没权利这么做
For example, if a car is going on a racetrack and you're seeing it from the top, if the speedometer says 60 miles per hour, you might say it's not accelerating.
例如,如果一辆车在跑道上行驶,你从上面俯视它,如果速率表显示的是60英里每小时,你也许会说它没有在加速
Maybe there is a difference there, I don't have a good theory as to what the difference is, since I don't have a good theory to what the difference is, I'm not in a good position to decide whether a reassembled body would be ? the same body or different body?
也许这两个案例是有不同,我没有充分的理论来,解释这两者之间的不同,由于我无法解释两者的不同,我也就无法去下结论,究竟重组的肉体,是原来的肉体还是不一样的肉体?
Well, maybe the answer is there's no particular time at all when I killed him But for all that, it's true that I killed him ? What makes it true that I killed him?
也许答案是,我什么时候杀死他根本没有确切的时间,尽管如此,我杀死他是真的,为什么我杀死他是真的?
应用推荐