That's an obvious objection, a lot more than --thanks than do Bill Gates and Michael Jordan.
这很明显,穷人更需要钱,谢谢,比盖茨和迈克尔·乔丹需要得多。
Michael Jordan is not as wealthy as Bill Gates but he did pretty well for himself.
迈克尔·乔丹没有比尔·盖茨那么富有,但他也自有一番成就。
Michael Jordan did fast food companies, kobe Bryant, and then you of course get all the cartoon characters like Sponge Bob and other things that over the years have been associated with a number of these products, so that--those attachments are very important. Yes?
迈克尔·乔丹为快餐店代言,还有科比·布莱恩特,当然,还有那些卡通角色,像海绵宝宝等其它角色,多年以来,它们都与,一系列产品紧密联系,所以这些联系是十分重要的,对吧
Exactly, and society derived a lot of benefit and pleasure from watching Michael Jordan play.
确实是,社会也从中得到了很多好处,欣赏迈克尔·乔丹打球,乐在其中。
In the case of Michael Jordan, some... I mean, to illustrate your point.
以迈克尔·乔丹为例。,我是说,用他来证明你的观点。
Remember Michael Jordan, Bill Gates, the libertarian objection to taxation for redistribution?
迈克尔·乔丹,比尔·盖茨的例子中,自由主义反对通过征税进行财富再分配?
You wanna see Michael Jordan. There he is.
想看迈克尔·乔丹,这就是他。
应用推荐