So,composition alone can't give you the answer to the question why is the plywood superior to the solid pine board?
只用组成成分无法解答,这个问题,为什么胶合板要优于松木板呢?
Oh. The question of why they chose--the baby-- the kids chose the rocket ship one as opposed to the Rafael one.
这个问题是,为什么婴儿会选择火箭飞船的贴纸,而不是拉斐尔的贴纸
What exactly that purgation will entail and why Milton's voice needs to be purged at all I think these questions are really the subject of the entire rest of the poem.
这种净化是很有必要的,弥尔顿的语言为什么需要被完全净化,我认为这个问题才是所有剩余诗歌,真正的主题。
OK, but before I do that, let me drive home this idea of why this is a recipe.
好了,但是在我做那个之前,我们要把这个想法拉回到,“为什么这是个方法“这个问题上来。
But Yeats doesn't answer the question, does he? Well, why not?
但叶芝没有回答这个问题,为什么他不回答呢?
I simply want to point out enough about the problem to help you see why I don't think free will is a slam-dunk for the soul.
我只是想尽可能地,把这个问题提出来,以帮助你们认识到,为什么我不认同自由意志是灵魂的制胜利器
Because I thought about it a lot Welles chose that word I guess obviously that frame was a happy picture ? In the word? Why that word?
因为我对这个问题想了很多,为什么威尔斯要选择这个词,我觉得很明显,这个镜头是幸福的,词内涵的深意?还是为什么选这个词?
Why do we want to know the answer to that question?
为什么我们想知道这个问题的答案?
Why? Because they didn't ask the question that they needed to ask,which was,in that particular case, the salutogenic question: why do some individuals succeed ? despite unfavorable circumstances?
为什么呢?因为他们没有提出这样的问题,这特定情况下,他们应该问这个问题,这个健康本源的问题,为什么有些人,成长环境恶劣,依然能成功?
But why is this problem happening?
但是为什么会发生这个问题呢?
We'll see why they have to separate that in a minute, but they do that these lipid bi-layers solve that problem for them and they're self-assembled structures from these molecules called phospholipids.
我们马上会讲到为什么要把它们隔离开,脂质双层膜解决了这个问题,而这些自主装结构,就是由磷脂分子组成的
And the question is, so how many pigs does he have, and how many chickens does he have? Wow. What a deep problem, right? But you're going to see why we're going to use this in a second. So you know how to solve this, this is a fifth-grade problem, right?
为了避免歧义,这些猪和鸡都是健全的,现在问题是它到底有多少只猪和鸡呢?,多深刻的一个问题啊,对吗?,但是你将要看到的是,我们为什么要举这个例子,你知道如何解答这个问题?
Which is sort of the question we'd immediately like to ask. Instead, I asked why did it produce the result it did. So I'm not asking myself what's wrong? Or how could I make it right?
其实这个问题我们马上就要问,我问了为什么它会返回这样的结果,因此我并没有去在意哪儿错了,或者我该怎么改正它,我在意的是它?
Why did I focus on that one?
为什么我强调这个问题呢
The question was, if you didn't hear, why do I have two equal signs?
这个问题是,如果你没听到问题的话,我为什么要用两个等号呢?
the abuse is, you know, it's not quite right, it depends upon whether it's all ready, but you can see in either case, after 12 steps, 2 runs through this and down to a problem size b over 2.
在12步以后,两轮过后,这个问题的范围b被缩小了一倍,这为什么很不错呢?,这意味着再来12步。
So the question was, why is this return down at this level, it says, well if I ever execute out of this FOR loop, I get to the end of the FOR loop without hitting that branch that took me through the return, then and only then do I want to actually say, gee, I got to this place, there isn't any value to return, none I'm going to return none and none.
问题是,为什么它是在这个级别上返回值呢,意思就是如果我出了这个for循环,就意味着我运行的过程中没有走到任何,带return的支路上去,这时也只有这时我才能说天呐,我终于走到这儿了,这时不会返回任何值,只会返回none和。
应用推荐