One interesting thing that they proposed is that we should have what they call " "objectives based regulation."
在他们的提议中有一个非常有意思的东西,我们应该称它为,“目标评估“
The second question I want to ask is what's the base case? When do I get down to a problem that's small enough that it's basically trivial to solve? Here it was lists of size one. I could have stopped at lists of size two right. That's an easy comparison.
第二个问题是什么是基础条件?,我要将问题分解到何时才使得问题,小到可以解决的基本问题?,这里是当列表的长度为1有时候,我也可以在长度为2的时候停止分解,那是一个非常简单的对比。
And,this republic is strongly identified with Paris, and if,because of the fear of Caesarism, the fear of another Napoleon, or another Robespierre before that, or another Napoleon III, they create executive authority that's extremely weak.
这个共和国很大程度上就等同于巴黎,由于惧怕个人独裁,惧怕出现另一个拿破仑,或在那之前出现另一个罗伯斯庇尔,或另一个拿破仑三世,为防万一,他们将行政权定得非常弱
This is a very important mission and so there is a computer program named Hal that helps run the ship and takes a lot of the burdens off of the part of the human astronauts who are on the ship.
这是一项非常重要的任务,因此,一个被命名为哈尔的计算机程序,被安排协助飞船的运行,减轻飞船上,人类宇航员的负担
应用推荐