• Even though these best responses are pretty complicated it turns out that there's only one Nash Equilibrium in this game.

    虽然最佳对策是很复杂的,在这个博弈却只有一个纳什均衡

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • How do we know that everyone choosing 1 is the Nash Equilibrium in the game where you all chose numbers?

    我们怎么知道在那个数字游戏,选择1就是这个博弈的均衡

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • With a fractional reserve system you're in an unstable equilibrium.

    伴随着部分准备金银行制度,英国的银行业处于一个不平稳的均衡

    耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

  • In the case of the Investor Game last week, every player preferred one equilibrium to the other.

    比如上一讲投资博弈,每个参与人都偏好同一个均衡

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • The reason is that the best response for Firm 1, So it turns out it's pretty to check that this is the only Nash Equilibrium in the game.

    因为公司1的最佳对策,所以很容易验证,这是此博弈唯一的纳什均衡

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • Now here we ended up with two centrist candidates, which is a result pretty close to what we saw in the Hoteling model, Is this an equilibrium?

    现在我们最终有2个间派候选人参选,这与我们,在霍特林模型看到的非常相似,这是一个均衡

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • So Beatrice won this election, is this array a Nash Equilibrium?

    比阿特丽斯在选举获胜获胜,这是一个纳什均衡

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • In the coordination game, where the idea is to try and get people to coordinate on a particular equilibria rather than on another equilibria, or worse still, to be uncoordinated entirely.

    在协调博弈,领导力的作用就是促成人们达成,某个特定均衡而不是其他均衡,甚至是完全缺乏协调的混乱状态

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定