So in the textbook, you'll sometimes see the term a strategy profile or a strategy vector, or a strategy list.

你会看到有的课本中称它为,策略组合,策略向量或者策略列表

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

We know, from the very first lesson of the class last time, that no one should choose these strategies.

从上堂课中,我们学到了,不要采用这类策略

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

This is one of the primary strategies that Milton develops, especially in the first two books of Paradise Lost, as a kind of defense against his dependence on classical literature.

这是弥尔顿发展出的早期策略之一，尤其是在《失乐园》的前两册书中,这似乎是在反驳他对古典文学的依赖。

耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

Let's assume that you've won the lottery, and have serious money that you foolishly wish to invest in the stock market There are two basic strategies to choose from in investing.

让我们假设你赢了彩票，然后又一大笔钱,而你很傻的想要投资到股票中去,有两个投资策略,可以选择。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

So these strategies -- let's be careful here with the word weakly here -- these strategies are not weakly dominated in the original game.

所以这些策略,对于这里的弱一词,我们要谨慎对待,这些策略在原博弈中并不是弱劣势的

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So we know that all the numbers between 45 and 30, these strategies were not dominated.

所以可知选择30至45之间的数,这样的策略在原博弈中并不是劣势的

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

The strategies that are less than 67 but bigger than 45, I think these strategies are not, they're not dominated strategies in the original game.

对于选择大于45而小于67的数,我认为他们并不是,在原博弈中并不是劣势策略

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

In your Economics - in your Intro Economics class in 115 or 110, you saw some pretty good examples of situations that were not strategic.

在你们经济学基础课115或者110中,应该讲过一些不是策略形势的案例

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So we were able to dominate 1 and 10 in the first round, so we know this won't be played, and we know this won't be played.

在第一次推理中1和10是劣势策略,我们知道无人会采用它们,我们就不会去采用它们

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Let's look at my payoffs from choosing these three options Up, Middle, and Down, if I think it's equally likely that my opponent will choose Left and Right.

我们来看一下我从上中下这三个策略中,分别能获得什么样的收益,如果我认为我对手,选择左或右的可能性相同

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Does 5 dominate 6, or 6 dominate 5, or anything like that?

在选立场5或是6二者中有劣势策略吗

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So rational choice in this case, people not choosing a dominated strategy; people choosing a dominant rational choice can lead to outcomes that - what do Americans call this?--that "Suck."

理性的选择,即本案例中人们不去选择劣势策略,反而选择优势策略,使总结果变得,美国人怎么说的,"糟糕"

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

We also saw in that numbers game last time that in some games, but by no means all games, in some games this process actually converges to a single choice.

我们同样可以发现,在某些博弈中,不是所有的博弈,迭代剔除劣势策略,最终会导致唯一的选择

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

And underlining what arises in this game, notice that in this game we're able to eliminate one of the strategies, in this case the strategy of shooting to the middle, even though nothing was dominated.

我们从这个博弈中可以得出,我们能够剔除其中的一个策略,在本案例中是从中路射门,尽管这里并没有劣势策略

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So the strategy choices, we're not going to do it in hours, let's just normalize and regard these choices as living in 0 to 4, and you can choose any number of hours between 0 and 4.

我们用小时数来表示策略吧,用0到4的数字来标记这些策略,你可以从0到4中任选工作的小时数

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选