It may be owned by other individuals but it has its own rights and responsibilities as if it were a person.

它的所有权也许属于其他个体,但它有自己权利和义务,就像个自然人一样

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

So justice is higher, individual rights are privileged, but not for reasons that depart from utilitarian assumptions.

所以公正是更高级的，个体权利是种特权，但并不能出于功利主义假设之外的理由。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

Are there rights on the individual or rights really more appropriately for whole peoples?

权利是属于个体的,还是说真的更适用于所有人？

普林斯顿公开课 - 人性课程节选

And his basic rights were seen to be absolute, for nothing must interfere with the right of each individual to defend his life, liberty, and property.

人的基本权利被视作每个个体都绝对拥有的,任何事物都无法干涉的,自卫,自由,财产的权利

耶鲁公开课 - 古希腊历史简介课程节选

So there may be certain rights that the minority members have that the individual has that shouldn't be traded off for the sake of utility?

所以可能少数人,或个体的某些权利,不该为了功利最大化而被牺牲？

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

Are rights individual? And do rights require duties?

权利是否属于个体？是否要求承担义务？

普林斯顿公开课 - 人性课程节选

What about Mill's attempt to reply to the objection about individual rights?

穆勒是如何回应对个体权利的相关异议呢？

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

One has to do with whether utilitarianism adequately respects individual rights or minority rights, and the other has to do with the whole idea of aggregating utility or preferences or values.

一点是关于，功利主义,是否充分尊重个体和少数的权利，另一点是关于,加总功利，或偏好，或价值的看法。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

It is a right that attaches to individuals as human beings, even before government comes on the scene, even before parliaments and legislatures enact laws to define rights and to enforce them.

这种权利依附于个体而存在，甚至早于任何政府的建立，甚至早在任何议会和立法机关,制定法律定义权利并强制实施前，就已存在。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

In 1859, Mill wrote a famous book on liberty, the main point of which was the importance of defending individual rights and minority rights, and in 1861, toward the end of his life, he wrote the book we read as part of this course, "Utilitarianism."

859年穆勒写了本关于自由的名著，书里的主要观点是,争取个体和少数群体权利的重要性，1861年，在晚年时期，他写了《功利主义》，这也属于本课的阅读资料“

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选