-
All right, so unlike the other game, the two examples of coordination games we saw so far were really pure coordination problems.
没错,这和之前的博弈不同,目前为止我们看到的前两个案例,是纯粹的协调博弈
-
in fact,have splitting of personality So the very same case raises the very same problem for both the body view and the personality view.
分裂人格的可能,就是这同一个案例引起了从肉体理论,和人格理论两个角度相同的问题。
-
And if we do that calculation, what we find out is that the binding energy, in this case where we have no shielding, 72× is negative 8 . 7 2 times 10 to So, let's compare what we've just seen as our two extremes.
我们会发现结合，能在这个情况中，没有屏蔽，等于-8。,所以我们来对比一下,我们在两个极端的案例中看到了什么。
-
So we'll come back and talk about more of these things as the course goes on, but let's just come back to the two we forgot there: so the collusion case and the case back in Law & Order with the prisoners in the cell.
随着课程的深入,我们会继续讨论更多类似的问题,但现在我们先回到之前的两个案例,串通和法制的案例,即囚徒困境
-
That's bad,right? Two different cases give us two different, diametrically opposed,answers on the very same question.
那就糟了，对吧？两个不同的案例，在同一个问题上给了我们截然不同的答案。
-
In many moods--at least,when I think about not the simple, the ordinary David Smith case with a single belief or two, but the full bodied--that's a bad term-- the full blown Napoleon case with all the memories,all the beliefs.
至少我想到的不是，这个简单的只拥有一两个信念的案例，而是完全的，不该这么说-,完整的拥有全部记忆和信念的拿破仑。
-
And it's worse still because it's not really, if we're careful and think about it, it's not really as though we have two different cases and intuitively we want to give different answers to those two different cases.
更糟的是，假如我们仔细思考一下，这其实不是两个不同的案例,并不是在直觉上得到两个不同的答案。
-
Maybe there is a difference there, I don't have a good theory as to what the difference is, since I don't have a good theory to what the difference is, I'm not in a good position to decide whether a reassembled body would be ? the same body or different body?
也许这两个案例是有不同，我没有充分的理论来,解释这两者之间的不同,由于我无法解释两者的不同，我也就无法去下结论,究竟重组的肉体,是原来的肉体还是不一样的肉体？
应用推荐