It allows for this map between a symbol, say a spoken word, and any sort of thought we want to use.
语言允许在符号,比如说出的一个词,与我们想要使用的任何想法之间,存在着这种映射关系
So compare the definition of words with what's written here in the nerdy notation on the board.
不妨去对比一下这个定义的,文字表述与黑板上的符号表述
He says: he signification "sign" has always been comprehended and determined, in its sense, as sign-of, signifier referring to a signified, signifier different from its signified.
他说,“符号“的意义“,总是被理解和决定的,在符号这个意义上,能指指向所指,能指与它的所指不同。
And what this means is we can use --take any arbitrary idea in the world, the idea of a chair or a story or a country, and make a sound or a sign to connect to it.
符号任意性是指,我们可以拿来世间任何想法,比如椅子,故事,或是国家,再发明一种声音或符号来与之相联系
All right, q has to be just the opposite of this because we've already figured out that there's no change in u.
好,q一定与它,相差一个符号,因为我们已经,指出U是不变的。
One of the texts of de Man -also in the book called Allegories of Reading where you'll find also a version of the essay "Semiology and Rhetoric" one of the essays that those who had actually read de Man actually argued about in a persistent fashion is called "The Purloined Ribbon."
德曼的一篇文章,同样在《阅读的寓言》这本书中能找到,在这本书中还能找到“符号学与修辞“的一个版本“,这是一篇读过德曼的人都会,不停争论的文章,它叫“偷窃的缎带“
So very similar idea, but the only thing is, I'm slightly abusing notation here by saying that my payoff depends on my strategy and a belief, but what I really mean is my expected payoff.
这和以前的概念差不多,唯一的不同,就是我这里稍微用了一些数学符号,来表述策略带来的收益与所持信念有关,这里的收益指的是预期收益
应用推荐