- But there's one potential gotcha here -- and this is where you have to be kind -- of piecing together the little clues along the way -- what have I done that's interesting here that had I not, I would have had a mathematical error?
但是这里有一个可能性-,这就是你需要把,一些线索拼凑在一起-,我这里所做的是很有趣的,如果我不这样做,我可能已经犯了个数学错误?
But when you start doing scientific research or financial work, imprecision and rounding errors start to add up.
但如果你碰到涉及科学研究,或财政方面的项目时,不精确度,和错误就会累加。
He has it exactly right. OK? Is this smaller than that? No. Now that's a slight lie.
不,这是一个小谎言,抱歉,是一个小错误,如果我要这么说。
That'll catch a lot of just silly mistakes for you if you go back and see it and you don't have all of that.
这可以让你抓到很多低级错误,如果你回去发现它们不一样的话。
It's a widely--it is widely and mistakenly thought that the purification offering purifies the sinner or the impurity bearer or the offerer. This can't be true.
很多人错误得认为,净化祭可以净化不洁者或供奉者,身上的罪孽或不洁,事实并非如此。
I think,as far as I can see,that the claim we all die alone, however we interpret it,just ends up being implausible or false.
在我看来,说我们全都会孤独而死,无论怎样解释都是不合理的,错误的。
- That's the idea of misattribution-- aroused due to something else, " "don't know what that is."
这就是张冠李戴-,错误认定性觉醒因素,“我不知道这是什么“
No, it still wouldn't be right. - And tell us why it wouldn't be all right.
不,还是错误的,-告诉我们理由,为什么是错的。
So, even though the lines were wrong, he says, no, that is hydrogen.
所以,即使那光线是错误的,他说,不,它就是氢。
There may be bad reasons but there's no wrong answers.
有不充分的理由,但没有错误的理由
Psychology is not just the study of disease,weakness,and damage it also is the study of strength and virtue, Treatment is not just fixing what is wrong; it also is building what is right.
心理学不仅是对疾病,弱点和伤害进行研究,它也研究优点和美德,治疗不只是修复错误;,同时也要塑造正确的东西。
t think that was a mistake -Interesting.
我不认为那是个错误,-有意思,I,don’
So my answer is always going to be zero and therefore almost always going to be wrong. Yeah?
所以我的答案总会是,因此,几乎这总是错误的,对不?
If you're not updating some variable by incrementing it or decrementing it -- if you're not changing anything, presumably the conditions are never going to evaluate to false or the opposite, so you're just going to have an infinite loop, which might be your goal, but odds are it's not.
如果你不通过增加或减少它来改变一些变量,-如果你不改变什么,大概那个条件永远不会变成错误的,或相反的,所以你将得到一个无限循环,那可能是你的目标,但可能也不是。
And we'll see innumerable error messages today and onward as with you working at home ends on the problem sets 'cause this is the way you learn.
我们将会看到数不清的错误信息,当你在家里做习题集的时候,这也是学习的一种方式。
OK, so what else do I have then in my little class definitions here?
你需要重新计算其他的值,来让保证不出现错误?
If he had all of that,it's not so clear to me that it would be the wrong thing to say that, by golly,this is Napoleon.
如果他都拥有这些,那我就不太确定,这么说是否错误了,天哪,这是拿破仑。
It's best if you don't know what that is or even if you do mistakenly attribute it, misattribute it, to physical attraction, romance, intimacy, passion and commitment, it's love.
最好是如果你不知道是什么,甚至如果你错误认定,以为是生理吸引力,浪漫,亲密,激情和承诺,那是爱情。
It may be a kind of failure to conduct the logic.
或许有着某种不合理性和错误。
it's not as good as helping debug, sorry, that's the wrong way of saying it's not as good at catching some things before you run them, it is easier at some times in debugging as you go along on the fly.
它在帮助我们调试方面可能不是太优秀,对不起,这么说有点不正确,它在运行前捕捉错误,可能不是那么优秀,可能边运行边调试,会更容易一些。
I'm much better having an exception get handled at the time of input than to let that prop -- that value rather propagate through a whole bunch of code until eventually it hits an error 17 calls later, and you have no clue where it came from.
不是我期望的格式,这时我最好有一个异常处理,而不是让其传下去,这个值传到代码的整个分支,最终会导致一个错误17调用的发生,并且你不知道这个错误是哪里来的。
We make more mistakes than tasks that don't involve lying and deception.
相对于不包含谎言与欺骗的任务,我们犯下的错误会更多
But it's an attempting mistake if you're not being careful.
但如果你们不注意,这个错误还是有可能的。
And you could see this even with smaller pratfalls.
有时候错误不那么严重。
It's going to segfault, right?
出现段错误,对不?
Right, it's a syntactic error, because it doesn't know how to deal with this.
好,这是个语法错误,这是因为计算机不知道怎么来解释着个。
It's that they can't be wrong.
而在于它们不可能是错误的。
It can't be wrong.
这种预测不可能是错误的。
bug You're gonna run into innumerable bugs most likely, by bugs we mean mistakes, - behaviors that you didn't quite intend and yet they seem to be-- and yet your program seems to be misbehaving in some sense.
你可能会制造数不清的,对了,我们称bug为错误或,你完全没有预料到的行为,但是它们的确存在-,这样看来,你的作品在某种意义上可以说是行为不端。
And so I've done a little bit different things here which is I put the accept part of the block with I O error.
所以我这里在处理部分,所做的同io错误,有一点不一样,这表明什么。
应用推荐