Maybe in this world, minds and bodies are identical, even though in other logically possible worlds the identity comes apart.

也许在这个世界,心灵和身体就是相同的,即使在其他逻辑世界中,不存在这种同一性

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Isn't the reason I think unicorns are logically coherent is because I can imagine them so easily?

我认为,独角兽在逻辑上不矛盾的原因,不正是因为我能够轻易的想象它们吗

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Though he sometimes does talk about texts that we call "literary," indeed he very often does, nevertheless Derrida's position and the logic of that position suggest that we can't really reliably discriminate among genres.

尽管他有时确实会讨论被我们称为“文学“的文本“,事实上他经常如此，然而德里达的立场和他立场的逻辑,是我们不能够明确地划分文学的体裁。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

But why don't I apply this same logic?

但为何不使用相同的逻辑呢？

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

As a statement of logic, that's false.

从逻辑上讲这是不合理的

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

I think that at least for many of us, there is a sort of logical conundrum we go through and that is, if good people don't vote then we'll be in a bad world; so I have to vote to prove that good people vote, then maybe it will happen.

我想,至少对大部分人来说,必须面对一个逻辑上的难题,就是,如果好人不投票,那我们将会生活在坏人操纵的世界里,所以我必须要投票,来证明好人会投票,那未来的国家将会由好人掌控

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

And for Problem Set 0, too, those of you might think Scratch kind of imploding since I was 6, well then we'll hand you some of these little logic boards which are a variety of real world sensors you can connect to your Mac or PC and push yourself a little further with interactions, with the real world.

对于习题集0也是如此,有些人可能认为从我6岁开始就不怎么用Scaratch了,那么我给你一些小的逻辑板,它们就是各种各样的真实世界的感应器,你可以用它们来连接到你的手机或电脑上去,和现实世界做进一步的互动。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

Let me go ahead and call print F. I'm going to say A equals A and then I need a percent D, backslash, comma A; so this is a little bit of -- more syntax than would be nice, %d but I'm just saying, literally, A equals percent D, and I'm plugging in the value of A for percent D.

我们继续调用printf，我说明A等于,然后我需要%d，反斜杠n，逗号;,所以这个有点--偏向逻辑的，而不偏向美观的，但是我刚说了，字面上，A等于，我用%d插入了A的值。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选