-
So I mean philosophy can talk about how do we know we got a table here between us. Right?
比如，哲学可以告诉我们是怎么感知到,我们之间有一个桌子，对不对？
-
In terms of primitive data, what we saw were two kinds: Right?
在基础数据方面，我们上节课学了两种类型对不对？
-
As Gadamer says, this is the characteristic idea of the Enlightenment: its prejudice against prejudice, that we can be objective, Okay, fine. But prejudice is bad, we know prejudice is bad.
如伽达默尔所说，这是启蒙运动时期的标志性观点：,对偏见有偏见，我们应该客观，好，但是偏见是不对的，我们知道偏见是不对的。
-
But it turns out that as we'll see that functions absolutely take arguments, right?
但结果是我们将看到,函数绝对是有参数的，对不对？
-
Socrates says, "No. On the contrary, we do have reason, based on the argument from recollection, to conclude that the soul was around before we were born."
苏格拉底说,不对,恰恰相反,基于回忆论,我们有理由去说,灵魂存在于我们出生之前
-
I'm sorry, that's not right. I don't want to get this wrong, 25,051, and we learn that in a Cretan village, two nurses, one girl, and one boy are employed.
对不起,不对,我不是有意犯错,两万五千零五十一头,我们了解到在一个克里特的村子,两名护士,一个女孩和一个男孩被雇佣了
-
So let's take Steven's conjecture and see if it's true.
让我们看看斯蒂文的推测对不对
-
Now we can debate what Jefferson got right or wrong there, or what's held up, but do note how he said both sides were either jealous or zealous of their own liberties.
现在我们讨论下他说的哪些对哪些不对,或者哪些还未有定论,但是请注意他提到双方对于自由态度是,用词的区别,一方珍惜一方热衷
-
Well, again, it used to be believed that the brain is wired up like a computer, like a PC or a Mac or something like that, but we know this can't be true.
人们曾经以为大脑是像计算机那样,组装起来的,像台个人电脑或苹果电脑,但我们知道这种观点是不对的
-
Right? We need a big sound here.
对不对,我们需要宏大的声音
-
Then if I'm looking for the square root of something less than 1, I know it will be in my region, right?
如果我要求平方根的数小于,我就知道我们的答案应该,在0-1这个区间了，对不对？
-
We've talked about data, we've talked about operations, and we've talked about commands or statements. All right?
我们学习过操作，我们还学习过,命令或者说是声明了，对不对？
-
So if we look at what we've got here, we've got something rather peculiar, right? What's peculiar about what this computer is now printing for us?
那么如果我们看看，现在我们得到的，结果的话，结果相当奇怪,对不对？计算机现在显示的结果？
-
Good programming style. All right? Things that we ought to do, as you put these pieces together in order to give you really good code.
优秀的编程风格，对不对？,为了得到真正优秀的代码,我们在把代码放到一起的时候。
-
And then we'll see if it is. So I think I put in one a two, right? Or one a two?
我认为我们把1a2放进了数组对不对？,那么显示结果应该是1，a，2了？
-
This is another way of doing exponentiation, but this one's a recursive function. All right?
但这是一种递归的方法对不对？,好，让我们看看这种方法？
-
But we fixed it on the fly. Thank you.
对不对？这是我们会去。
-
So let's look at a little example, and this is going to, excuse me, both allow us introduce the syntax as well as what we want to have as the flow of control inside of here.
让我们看个小例子，这个程序会，对不对，请允许我,一边顺着控制流进行,一边讲解语法。
-
Now. You might look at that and say, well that's just a lot like what we had over here Right? We had some additive constant plus a simpler version of the same problem reduced in size by 1.
现在你可能会看着这个说，这很像我们以前做过的,对不对？我们用一些附加的常量,加上问题的另外一个规模缩小了1的,简化版本来代替这个问题本身。
-
It says, if answer, sorry, imagine x is -16, ANS is 0 is less than -16, no. So what does it do?
对不对？让我们来看看，如果答案，对不起0,如果x是-16的话，ANS为0，小于-16吧，对？
-
That's what we just did there, right?
也就是我们刚刚学到的对不对？
-
We know that's not true.
我们知道那是不对的。
-
Even if there is an immortal soul-- Sorry. Even if there is a non-physical soul that's part of me, we don't yet have any reason to believe that it's one of the fundamental building blocks that were being recycled.
即使灵魂是不灭的,不对,即使有个非现实的灵魂是我的一部分,我们并没有任何理由去相信,灵魂是被循环利用的,基本组成部分之一
-
I'm going to get back to your answer in a second because you're heading in the right direction.
内嵌的循环，这儿，我们做了m次,但是它内部还有一步呢，对不对？
-
Somebody help me out. What am I looking for?
到了t我们就该停止了对不对？
应用推荐