Anybody have any questions on that, because when we voted, the majority of the class thought it was reversible Yes.
上节课我们投票时,多数人都认为它是一个可逆过程,而现在大家应该都知道了,它其实是不可逆过程,有问题吗?
We'll be using the solutions, so you shouldn't have a problem, but I wanted to point it out so it does not look too strange to you.
我们将会用它的解,所以你们不应该问题,但是我想提出它,这样你们就不会对它太陌生。
So it's not just a question of the past, as I say and as I've said before.
正如我以前说过的,它不只是过去的问题。
Eight features of literary modernism: An obsession with the idea of art's autonomy, the idea that art is its own law, that it responds to no other laws, that it has no other purpose than its own purposes.
第一,对艺术意志自由问题的困扰,对艺术是自身的法律,它不响应其他准则,它只有本身这唯一的目的,也就是说。
But that doesn't mean that it is important or the "is", the fact that it is important doesn't mean we ought to do it.
但那不代表它是重要的,问题在于这个“是,它是重要的但不代表我们应该去做。
So I'm not suggesting that it's an optional problem set that you shouldn't do.
一个可做可不做的问题集,因为不做它你会后悔的。
Well, you might think it's an empirical question, and in fact I am inclined to think it's an empirical question, varying from person to person.
你可能觉得这是个实证问题,我也倾向于认为它是实证问题,各人的情况各不相同。
I want it or I disapprove of it and, lo and behold, it's no longer aesthetic. I'll come back to that in a moment, but I hope you can see that that is a distinction between the purposive and the purposeful.
我会产生想法,比如想得到它还是觉得它恶心,你瞧,这样一来就不只是纯审美问题了,我一会儿再回来讲,但是我希望你们现在可以区分,“合目的性“和“目的性“这两个概念了,它们是有区别的。
I don't care how you do it on exams or on problem sets, but you do need to be aware that the 3 d once filled is lower in energy than the 4 s, and the reason you need to be aware of that is if you're asked for the electron configuration now of the titanium ion.
我不关心你们在考试或者,问题集中如何做它,但是你们的确需要知道3d一旦被填充,它的能量是小于4s的,你们需要知道这个的原因,是如果你现在被要求,写出钛离子的电子构型。
应用推荐