Both Hartman and Fish argued that the rhetorical strategies of Milton's similes work to reinforce the theological categories of good and evil.

哈特曼和费什都论述到这里修辞上的策略,起到了加强,善与恶在神学层面上的区分。

耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

Let's talk sort of at a more tactical level, about what do we want you to know in this course.

我们来讲一些策略层面上的目标，关于我们希望你们从课程中学到什么。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

So by thinking about my opponent, by putting myself in my opponent's shoes, I realize that she has a dominant strategy, Alpha.

所以考虑到我的对手,站在她的立场上看,我发现她有一个优势策略α

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

And there're different people who have different tastes about what you do with this piece and that piece of land how do you approach this political issue and that issue.

不同的人有不同的喜好,在应该对这一国及那一国实行何种策略的问题上,在如何解决这一以及其它政治问题上意见都不同。

普林斯顿公开课 - 人性课程节选

By the way, I'm going to leave also to your sections the strange confusion that ensues in taking a rhetorical device, metonymy, and making it synonymous with grammar on the axis of combination.

另外，我还将把奇怪的困惑留给你们思考,这个困惑随着使用修辞学策略和转喻而产生，并使得它在结合轴上与语法有着同样的意思。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

So once again what this idea is this idea is you yourself should not play a dominated strategy.

所以再次强调,站在我们自己的立场上说,我们不应采用劣势策略

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So in that game we played at the end last time, what were the set of strategies?

上节课我们最后做的游戏,策略的集合是什么样的呢

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

The key strategy here, essentially the strategy is going to be very simple.

关键的策略,本质上,策略是非常简单的

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

But as a statement of strategy, it's a pretty good idea.

但从策略上讲,这是个不错的想法

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

And if I did this, and again, don't scribble too much in your notes but if we just make it clear what's going on here, I'm actually going to delete these strategies since they're never going to be played I end up with a little box again.

如果我再进行一次,别在笔记上乱画,我们只是想知道最后会怎样,因为这些策略不会被人采用,所以我剔除掉它们,最后我得到了一个更小的方格

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

We know from last time that you should not choose a dominated strategy, and we also know we probably aren't going to choose a weakly dominated strategy, and we also know that you should put yourself in other people's shoes and figure out that they're not going to play strongly or strictly or weakly dominated strategies.

上节课我们学到了,不要采用劣势策略,然后今天我们学到了,我们有时可能不会选择弱劣势策略,我们还学会了站在别人立场上思考,然后推测出他们不会选择,严格劣势策略或弱劣势则略

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Similarly, we can see that Right is not dominated, because it does better against Up, than does Left.

类似的,我们也得出右也不是劣势策略,因为参与人I选上时,选右比选左好

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选