The Apology shows Socrates as offering a new model of citizenship a new kind of citizen.

苏格拉底自辩篇》显示出苏格拉底,欲提出一种新模式的公民权，一种新型态的公民。

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

The Apology and the Crito represent a tension, they represent even a conflict between two more or less permanent and irreconcilable moral codes.

苏格拉底自辩篇》和《克里托篇》,代表着一种张力，它们甚至可说代表着两种,多少算是永恒,且无法调和的道德规范。

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

But this reading of the Apology as you might say is a kind of brief for freedom of expression and a warning against the dangers of censorship and persecution.

但阅读《苏格拉底自辩篇》，你可能会说,好似一种对言论自由的概述,还有对审查,及迫害危机的警告。

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

Maybe the answer, or an answer, to this question is revealed in the Crito, the companion dialogue, the companion speech that goes along with the Apology, although it typically gets much less attention than the Apology.

也许答案或任何一种响应，这个问题的答案都可在《克里托篇》寻得，这是柏拉图的另一篇语录，另一篇,与《苏格拉底自辩篇》等齐的辩论，但一般较少受到,与《苏格拉底自辩篇》等同的注意。

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选