So, keep that in mind when we're talking about atomic radius, I'm not suddenly changing my story and saying, yes, we do have a distinct radius.
因此,当我们讨论原子半径的时候要时刻记住这一点,我并不是在突然改变自己的说法,说是的,我们的确有一个准确的半径。
and it's not really easy to change that.
这一点不容易改变。
So the food environment can change and can change in productive ways and there are a lot of signs of this happening.
食品环境可以改变并可以很有创造性改变,有很多迹象都可以证明这一点
We are going to spend a whole week talking just about change, nothing directly related to positive psychology.
我们将用一周的时间讲改变,和积极心理学一点直接的关系也没有。
We are going to do it a little differently this year.
今年我们要做一点改变。
And now notice my prompt changed a little bit.
注意到没?前面的提示改变了一点点。
I actually want to change that around, if I might, and play with that, because that's a really useful image for us: "takes the mask off literature and reminds us how we come to be sympathetic or Richard Wright how we come to think something." Think back to Richard Wright, who wants words to disappear, to be completely transparent and to leave you just with your response.
实际上,我想要改变一点,可能的话,玩弄一下,因为那对我们是很有用的画面:,把文学的面具卸下,我们是如何同情,或思考事物的,回想一下,他希望文字消失,而变成透明的,只剩下你们的回应。
Milton has his hero, Samson, bewailing the fact of his blindness: "O dark, dark, dark, amid the blaze of noon irrecoverably dark, total eclipse without all hope of day!"
弥尔顿描写到自己崇拜的英雄参孙悲叹自己失明:,黑暗,黑暗,黑暗,在正午的光辉中,无法改变的黑暗,黯然的没有一点希望“
One of the main ideas we'll talk about is the distinction: we'll talk about specifically on the lecture on change between affect, behaviors and cognitions.
我们会集中讨论的一点是“差别:,在有关“改变“的课上中会着重谈,情感,行为和认知的差别。
And, probably most important of all is can the food environment change?
或许最重要的一点 食品环境能够改变吗
应用推荐