So the nature of the world, post-cold war world is increasingly one about competition for markets, govern of one nation's markets.
因此冷战之后,市场的竞争,成为世界的主题,一国市场的管理,如果事实如此。
And there're different people who have different tastes about what you do with this piece and that piece of land how do you approach this political issue and that issue.
不同的人有不同的喜好,在应该对这一国及那一国实行何种策略的问题上,在如何解决这一以及其它政治问题上意见都不同。
For Plato" he says "also is of the opinion that it is impossible for the disorders of the state ever to be taken away until sovereigns be philosophers."
对于柏拉图,他说道,也相信只有当一国君王,自己成为了哲学家,才可能将一国的纷乱扫尽“
Machiavelli's preference for these extreme situations expresses his belief that only in moments of great crisis, where the very existence of a state is at risk, does human nature truly reveal itself.
马奇亚维利偏好,这类极端的情势,表述出他相信,仅在重大危机的当头,当一国的存亡面临考验之时,人类的本性才会真正显现出来。
Why should citizens of one state, namely one's own have any moral priority over the citizens of another state when, again, we don't know them and we may well be mistaken in our assumption ? that they are enemies or friends?
为何一国的公民,即为何某人能拥有,凌驾其它城邦公民的道德优势,尤其是我们根本不了解他们,我们可能误将他们,错认为是敌人或朋友?
应用推荐