Regimes or constitutions you might say are forms or formalities that determine how power is shared and distributed among citizens.

政体或宪法是一堆形式或形态,那决定了权力如何,共享与分配给其公民。

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

Well, that's pretty difficult. It, you know, I think it's easiest to do that in sort of an informal way.

分配起来确实挺困难的。你知道的，以一种非正式的方式反而更容易做到。

有趣的室友们 - SpeakingMax英语口语达人

One of them is as a shareholder and the shareholder gets a share-- is entitled to a share--of the profits.

其中一种是股东,股东持有股票,股东有权分配利润

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

Now, how many agree with that argument, agree with the libertarian argument that redistribution for the sake of trying to help the poor is wrong?

有多少人同意自由主义者的这一驳论，认为为了帮助穷人,进行财富再分配不对？

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

Every regime is an answer to that question because every regime sets forward a way of distributing formally distributing powers and distributing offices among its citizen body.

每一个政体都是这问题的答案，因,为每一个政体提出了一种分配的方式,正式地分配权力,并将官职分配给其公民本体。

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

Obviously with this sort of partitioning of behavior, and activities, and effort, there's not a lot of time leftover for leisure, for development of new technologies and things like this.

显然,采用这样一种,行为,活动及精力的分配方式,自然不会剩下很多时间,用来娱乐,发展技术和改革创新

耶鲁公开课 - 关于食物的心理学、生物学和政治学课程节选

The libertarian's argument against redistribution begins with this fundamental idea that we own ourselves.

自由主义者反对再分配的论断,始于人人自主这一基本理念。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选