For any one of those, we could again run an argument where we say, "Look, here is something that needs explaining.
对于以上任意一个,我们都能再次提出一个论证,看啊,这里有某个东西需要解释
And we have this myth that if you go into more than 3 libraries in your freshman year, you will not graduate.
我们有这样一个传说,如果你在大一的时候去过三个以上的图书馆,那你就毕不了业。
" Student: "Can someone feel consummate love for more than one person?"
学生:“一个人能同时和两个人以上拥有完美式爱情吗“
So, that makes it clear we're talking about a wealthy civilization, at least in which the rulers are wealthy, and in which the rulers, of course, are very powerful.
以上正说明了我们所讨论的是一个富有的文明,至少它的统治者很富有,当然,也很强大
The argument that eliminates strategies 67 and above, or 68 upwards, that strategy just involves the first lesson of last time: do not choose a dominated strategy, admittedly weak here, but still.
剔除67以上或者68以上的过程,仅仅用到了上堂课所提到的第一个结论,即不要采用劣势策略,虽然这里是弱劣势,但同理
That's just an example of a cell that in its very mature or differentiated form is quite different from other cells inside the body.
以上就是一个,分化成熟的细胞,区别于体内其它细胞的范例
Okay.So that's an example of a classical composer, admittedly in a pretty straightforward situation, using the same three-chord chord progressions we find in the Beach Boys.
好,以上我们举了一个古典作曲家的例子,诚然这个选段的结构比较简单,直接了当,它所用的包含三个和弦的和弦进程与我们在Beach,Boys音乐中分析的相同。
So we have two electrons in our bonding orbital, but because we use the same rules to fill up molecular orbitals as we do atomic orbitals, so the Pauli exclusion principle tells us we can't have more than two electrons per orbital, so we have to go up to our anti-bonding orbital here.
所以在成键轨道上有两个电子,但因为我们用了和原子轨道时,用的相同的规则,所以Pauli不相容原理告诉我们,一个轨道上不能有两个以上的电子,所以我们需要填充到反键轨道上去。
Oh. Can someone feel consummate love for more than one person?
噢,一个人能否同时和两个人以上拥有完美式爱情?
Different amount of metabolic activity because one has a greater volume of cytoplasm than the other, for example, so these are exactly the right kinds of ideas.
大小不同,代谢活动的总量就会不同,可能因为一个细胞的胞质比另一个体积大,以上这些观点都是非常正确的
By the next slice down we'll be able to eliminate what is it about 20 and above, so 30 down to above 20, and this will be an 'in shoes, in shoes, in shoes'.
再往下我们可以继续剔除,是多少来着,20以上的数,在20到30之间的,而这会是一个三次换位思考的过程
应用推荐