这种观点是经济学上的谬论。
我们能够同时做多件事是否是一个谬论呢？
这是肯定结果的谬论。
专业的神经科学家早就知道反向推理是谬论。
Practicing neuroscientists have known for years that reverse inference is a fallacy.
例外的谬论。
又是一个销售代表宣扬的谬论。
还有一个极少被反驳的谬论即出口有益，进口无益。
Another fallacy seldom contradicted is that exports are good, imports bad.
这完全是个谬论。
无法在物理上反映的东西，都是形而上学的谬论。
What cannot be rendered in the language of physics is metaphysical nonsense.
但是我们能研究研究下这个体系中衍生其他谬论分支的主谬论，即整个谬论网络体系的主干。
But we can examine here the mother fallacy that has given birth to this progeny, the main stem of the network.
我们明天去镇上去给你买眼镜“这不是谬论吗？”
斜坡谬论，这不是一个关于歧义的谬论。
Okay slippery slope fallacy. This is not a fallacy of ambiguity.
首先，你将浪费很多时间去把没用的谬论塞进自己的大脑。
First, you'll waste a lot of time filling your head with useless nonsense.
它倔强地重复着孔德的谬论。
尽管有时候-，有一种避免斜坡谬论的方法是，定义一些东西，你有时要用到斜坡谬论，难道不是吗？
Although sometimes - I mean one way of avoiding a slippery slope is by defining something. you have to use slippery slope sometimes don't we?
诸多文献资料是基于这个谬论，并且由于与诸如此类的谬论教条一道频繁出现，它自身也已经成为了这个互相支撑、关系错综复杂的谬论网络体系的一部分。
An enormous literature is based on this fallacy, and, as so often happens with doctrines of this sort, it has become part of an intricate network of fallacies that mutually support each other.
嗯，我们需要吃动物食品来得到蛋白质真的是个谬论。
Well, it's really a myth that we need to eat animal foodsfor protein.
谬论：如果你没有完成的产品那么你就不能做测试。
这甚至是谬论变得越来越怪诞的源头。
第二个谬论是我们这里看的是，求问题的谬论，第三是自我封闭论点。
Second fallacy we're looking at here is the fallacy of question begging and the thirdly is self sealing argument.
谬论：我们没有足够的资源和时间来全面测试产品。
Myth: We don't have enough resources or time to fully test the product.
这是仍然普遍存在的古来的谬论之一。
谬论：如果我们正在寻找很多程序缺陷，我们正在做重要的测试。
Myth: If we're finding a lot of bugs, we are doing important testing.
谬论是你们可以认出并解释，他们是谬论为什么看起来，是好论点但实际上不是。
Fallacies that you can just identify and explain they are fallacies why they look as if they are good arguments and they are not.
或者我们陷入其他人提供的谬论。
谬论：客户总是正确的。
谬论：客户总是正确的。
应用推荐