Sorry, if I created a wrong thread;
对不起，如果我创造了一个错误的论题；
Cleanup logic being executed on the wrong thread.
清理在错误线程上的逻辑错误。
This would be the wrong thread to return the response to the calling entity.
此线程将响应返回到调用实体时会发生错误。
In particular, it can help you root out the pitfalls of using the JNIEnv with the wrong thread and using critical regions incorrectly.
特别是，它可以帮助您确定在错误线程中使用JNIEnv以及未正确使用关键区域的缺陷的根源。
It seems like if Linux happens to pick the right thread to go on #1, it's good; but it can also pick the wrong one, and then it's very bad, resulting in a throughput of only 3.7e7 bits/second.
如果Linux碰巧选择了 #1上的正确线程，则可以正常工作；但是它也可能选择了错误的线程，如果那样则情况会非常糟糕，其吞吐量仅为 3.7e7位每秒。
It would be better if the right thread were on core 1, but we seem to be stuck with taking a chance that the wrong one ends up on core 1, and that's very bad, leaving cores 0 and 2 as the safe choice.
如果正确的线程位于核心1上将会更好，但是也可能会遇到错误线程正好位于核心1上的情况，这就会非常糟糕。保留核心0和2为安全选项。
Nothing looks wrong to either thread, but in actuality, we've allowed one thread to clobber the write of another.
每个线程都不认为有错，但实际，我们允许一个线程影响了另一个线程的写操作。
To state the restoring force of a simple pendulum during oscillation is the resultant force of the gravity of the ball and the pulling force of the thread is wrong .
常出现一些模糊认识，即认为单摆在振动中所受的回复力就是摆球所受重力与绳子拉力的合力，显然，这是错误的。
Since this is an old thread and the information in my original post is actually wrong I'm locking it.
由于这是一张老帖子了，并且在我原来的回帖中，信息是错误的，因此我锁定了它。
The failure of thread stick has nothing wrong with drilling collar and thread machining, it is only cause by uncorrected operation on site.
通过试验分析，认为钻铤材质和螺纹加工质量合格，钻铤粘螺纹与钻铤材质和加工质量无关，其主要原因是井队操作不当所致。
The failure of thread stick has nothing wrong with drilling collar and thread machining, it is only cause by uncorrected operation on site.
通过试验分析，认为钻铤材质和螺纹加工质量合格，钻铤粘螺纹与钻铤材质和加工质量无关，其主要原因是井队操作不当所致。
应用推荐