You may consider using WADL, or even WSDL 2.0 to provide a machine-readable equivalent.
你可能会考虑使用WADL，或者甚至是WSDL 2.0来提供一个机器可读的等价物。
The discussion here noted the interest in WADL and the similar suggestion for a "rest DL."
这里的讨论指出了WADL的利害，并对“REST DL”提出了的类似意见。
Marc Hadley, in his post, adds to the discussion, the idea that WADL can used to describe …
Marc Hadley在他的帖子中对讨论进行了补充，提到可以使用 WADL来 进行描述……
For those familiar with WSDL and WADL, the description in the previous section may look unconventional.
对于那些熟悉WSDL和WADL的人来说，上节的描述可能看起来有些不合常理。
If we can't do a better job, I think REST and REST description languages such as WADL will gain momentum.
如果我们不能做的更好，我想REST和REST描述语言，如WADL将获得动力。
The comparison this idea of “Hypermedia describes Protocols” to the WS-BPEL 1.1 spec or WADL is inevitable. He says
将“超媒体描述协议”这一观念与WS-BPEL 1.1规范或WADL进行比较是不可避免的。
I think services themselves can be adequately described, insofar as their technical specification, through a WSDL or WADL.
我认为通过WSDL或者WADL这些技术规范，服务可以充分地实现自我描述。
He describes how one might document a web application like the Sun Cloud API using WADL and goes on to illustrate his idea with an example.
他描述了一种对Web应用进行文档化的可能方式，如Sun云计算api使用WADL，并通过例子解释了其想法。
If you are writing the server-side code and the client-side code based on a machine-readable contract such as a WADL document, the coding flow may be as follows.
如果你正在编写基于机器可读契约(如wadl文档)的服务器端代码和客户端代码，编码流程可能如下。
There is a great deal of interest in following work such as WADL to better understand what is to be accomplished and how rather than pursuing premature standardization.
这些工作赢得了很多趣关注：如使WADL更好理解将要完成什么及如何完成，而不是追求不成熟的标准。
Note that my intent in this description is only to help tools and frameworks that want to monitor or test client-server interactions, but certainly not to mimic WSDL or WADL.
注意，在这个描述中，我的意图只是想帮助那些要监测或测试客户端/服务器端交互的工具和框架，当然不是要模仿WSDL或WADL。
It would be nice if the next version of service description would go beyond what WSDL or Web Application description Language (WADL) are today - "machine-readable" description of services.
如果服务描述的下一版本能够超越今天的WSDL或Web应用描述语言(WADL)——“机器可读的”服务描述，那当然很好。
It would be nice if the next version of service description would go beyond what WSDL or Web Application description Language (WADL) are today - "machine-readable" description of services.
如果服务描述的下一版本能够超越今天的WSDL或Web应用描述语言(WADL)——“机器可读的”服务描述，那当然很好。
应用推荐