Methods Patients with psoriasis were randomized to one of two treatment groups.
方法检测血瘀型银屑病患者治疗前后血脂、 载脂蛋白、 血液流变学变化。
The two treatment groups had difference(P<0.05) or obvious difference with model group(P<0.01).
各治疗组与模型组相比有差异（P<0.05）或显著差异（P<0.01）；
We used propensity score analysis to adjust for potential differences in baseline characteristics of patients in the two treatment groups.
我们使用倾向评分分析，以调整两个治疗组中患者基线特征的潜在差异。
Methods: 186 patients with salivary gland mucocele were randomly divided into two treatment groups, 93 cases in each group, and treated by microwave or surgery respectively.
方法：将186例黏液腺囊肿患者随机分成两组，每组各93例，分别采用微波治疗和传统手术切除治疗。
RESULTS: All the patients in the two groups finished the treatment and questionnaire measurement, and entered result analysis.
结果：两组患者均完成治疗和问卷测量，全部进入结果分析。
Observation two groups 'therapeutic effect in the endodontic treatment.
观察两组在牙髓治疗中的疗效。
Results Behavior score decreased markedly in the two groups after treatment and there was a statistically significant difference.
结果治疗后两组行为积分值明显下降，有显著的统计学意义；
Observation of the two groups of treatment.
观察两组的治疗效果。
Results The neurologic impairment score in the treatment group was decreased evidently, the effective rate was 89%, there were significant differences between the two groups (P<0.05).
结果治疗组神经功能缺损评分显著降低，有效率达89%，与对照组比较差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）。
Serum sodium level, the time for improvement of serum sodium and cardiac function were observed in two groups before and after treatment.
观察治疗前后两组血钠浓度、血钠与心功能改善时间。
No difference in treatment times between two groups.
两组在治疗次数上无明显差异。
The results indicate that the two methods in treatment groups both have the effect of improving some blood rheology indexes.
结果表明：治疗组的两种疗法均有改善部分血液流变学指标的作用。
Giving systematic education to the educational group while the control group only accept unclassied treatment, lastly two groups are compared each other with neopathy and result of treat.
对教育组进行了系统的健康教育，对照组只接受了一般性的治疗护理，然后对两组患者进行并发症及治疗效果方面的比较。
Two groups started treatment at early stage after operation.
两组分别在术后早期开始康复治疗。
After analysing the infection number in the two groups of patients, in the year preceding biological treatment no significant change arose.
分析了两组患者感染的数字后，较以前那些年的生物治疗没有明显的改善。
Results(The clinical) symptom reduction and sickbed time after treatment in the two groups were significantly different(P<0.05).
结果两组病人治疗后临床症状消失时间、卧床时间存在明显差异（P<0.05）。
Observe the clinical treatment of two groups of children with adverse reactions.
观察两组患儿的临床治疗与不良反应情况。
Methods Divide them into two groups at random: the treatment group using Ornidazole calcium hydroxide; and the comparative group using Camphor phenol.
方法通过随机分为两组，治疗组奥硝唑氢氧化钙糊剂组，对照组樟脑酚组。
The effectiveness of nursing and treatment was evaluated in the two groups at discharge.
出院时对两组患者的治疗护理效果进行评价。
Method: 60 cases were randomly assigned to two groups, 30 cases in treatment group taken Xiangsha Liujun Decoction plus ondansetron, and 30 in control simply taken ondansetron as comparison.
方法：60例随机分为两组，治疗组30例应用香砂六君汤加恩丹西酮治疗，对照组单纯用恩丹西酮治疗30例作比较。
Pain condition, range of motion (ROM), walking distance scale, lower limb reflexes and activity of daily living were assessed in the patients of the two groups after treatment.
治疗后对两组患者疼痛情况、腰部活动范围、跛行状况、下肢反射、日常生活能力进行评定。
Methods: were randomly divided into Doxofylline treatment group and the general treatment of the two groups, respectively Doxofylline and aminophylline infusion observed effect.
方法随机分为多索茶碱治疗组及一般治疗两组，分别采用多索茶碱及氨茶碱静滴，观察疗效。
Methods Selected 10 cases of patients with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and 10 cases of patients with ureteroscopic lithotripsy, and calculated the cost of treatment in two groups.
方法选取10例体外冲击波碎石患者与10例输尿管镜碎石患者，统计两组患者的治疗费用。
Methods The patients were randomized to two groups: treatment group, containing 16, by electric acupuncture and Fentazin; control group, containing 14, by Fentazin only.
方法随机分两组，治疗组16例，采用电针加奋乃静，对照组14例，单纯用奋乃静。
And there was no toxic action and adverse effects in two groups during the treatment.
两组在治疗过程中均无毒副作用及不良反应。
There were same period of the treatment and observation in two groups.
两组患者接受治疗和观察的时间相同。
Thromboclasis drug and other routine treatment were used in two groups.
两组均常规用溶栓和其他治疗。
Results There was a statistical significant(P<0.05) in two groups after the treatment, the observation group was better than the control group.
结果两组患者经治疗后在上述方面比较，差异均具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。
Result:The FEV1 and the percentage of FEV1 in two groups after treatment was superior to that before treatment, and there was significant difference in them respectively(P<0.05).
结果：两组患者FEV1、FEV1百分比均较治疗前改善，治疗前后比较差异具有统计学意义（P〈0.05）；
Result:The FEV1 and the percentage of FEV1 in two groups after treatment was superior to that before treatment, and there was significant difference in them respectively(P<0.05).
结果：两组患者FEV1、FEV1百分比均较治疗前改善，治疗前后比较差异具有统计学意义（P〈0.05）；
应用推荐