Two groups of patients with clinical effect comparison.
对两组患者的临床效果进行比较。
Compared two groups of patients with therapeutic effect.
对比两组患者治疗效果。
Compared two groups of patients with postoperative satisfaction.
比较术后两组患者满意程度。
The two groups of patients ( 17-60 years of age ) had no clear cardiovascular disease.
两组病人无明显心血管疾患，年龄17～60岁。
At the same time two groups of patients had oral hypoglycemic drugs and insulin therapy.
同时两组患者均口服降糖药物和胰岛素治疗。
Results: Two groups of patients with symptom score after treatment than before treatment to reduce.
结果：两组患者治疗后症状评分均较治疗前降低。
Efficacy and the therapeutic index compared to the situation two groups of patients after treatment.
比较两组患者治疗后的疗效及各项治疗指标情况。
Two groups of patients before and after January 1 week, more points were significantly decrease(P0.05);
两组患者治疗1周、1月前后比较积分均有明显下降（P0.05）；
Two groups of patients with no bleeding, but a small number of patients with infected surgical incision.
两组患者手术中无大出血现象，但少数患者手术切口感染。
Results Two groups of patients with diabetes fasting blood glucose level were no significant difference.
结果：两组糖尿病患者间空腹血糖水平无显著差异；
Results Significant difference between the two groups of patients (P<0.01), with statistical significance.
结果两组患者疗效比较，差异有统计学意义（P〈0．01）。
Then the tests of these two groups of patients to these expected pictures and accidental pictures of the memory.
随后测试了这两组病人对这些预期图片和意外图片的记忆力。
Observed after TACE, the blood cell analysis, hepatic function, and clinical situation of two groups of patients.
观察介入治疗后，两组病人血常规、肝功能、及临床症状情况。
Safety observation indicators, the two groups of patients during treatment shows no significant adverse reactions.
安全性观察指标方面，两组病人在治疗期间均未发生明显不良反应。
Up-effect time and sustained time of feeling and motion block, block effect of two groups of patients were observed.
观察两组患者感觉和运动阻滞的起效时间、持续时间及阻滞效果。
Record postoperative pain conditions in two groups of patients, and review tooth condition 3, 6, 12 months after operation.
记录两组患者术后疼痛情况，术后3、6、12个月复查患牙状况。
On two groups of patients in hospitalization throughout the course of infection phenomenon this paper analyzed the situation of.
对两组患者在住院治疗的整个过程中出现感染现象的具体情况进行比较分析。
After post-operative complications in two groups of patients, upper limb function follow-up observation of the inside of sensory.
术后对两组患者术后并发症、上肢内侧感觉功能进行随访观察。
After analysing the infection number in the two groups of patients, in the year preceding biological treatment no significant change arose.
分析了两组患者感染的数字后，较以前那些年的生物治疗没有明显的改善。
Two groups of patients did not have the appearances of aggravating and complication such as pulmonary embolism during the treatment period.
两组患者治疗期间无加重及肺栓塞并发症的出现。
Analysis of two groups of patients' consciousness recovery, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, the difference of epilepsy.
分析两组患者意识恢复、手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、癫痫的差别。
Two groups of patients with restenosis, no-reflow, vagal reflex, local bleeding puncture site hematoma, pseudoaneurysm was no significant difference.
两组患者在术后再狭窄、无复流、迷走反射、穿刺部位局部出血血肿、假性动脉瘤方面无显著性差异。
Two groups of patients with restenosis, no-reflow, vagal reflex, local bleeding puncture site hematoma, pseudoaneurysm was no significant difference.
两组患者在术后再狭窄、无复流、迷走反射、穿刺部位局部出血血肿、假性动脉瘤方面无显著性差异。
应用推荐