So you take two documents and diff them.
所以可以拿两个文档并用diff程序来比较它们。
Are the two documents technically the same?
这两个文档在技术上相同吗？
The result is Listing 13, with two documents.
结果是清单13，带有两个文档。
In addition, the two documents must be kept in sync.
此外，这两个文档还必须保持同步。
If all is well, you should only see two documents (see Listing 25).
如果正确，您将只会看见两个文档(参见清单25)。
The two documents had connections as well as difference.
这两个文件既有联系又有区别。
These two documents were drawn up under his personal guidance.
这两份文件是在他的亲自指导下起草的。
Assume that you want to merge two documents containing lists of products.
假设您需要合并包含产品列表的两个文档。
In other words, a parser would consider the two documents to be different.
换句话说，语法分析器会认为这两个文档是不同的。
On April 5th the IMF released two documents designed to achieve just that.
4月5号，IMF发布的两份文件正是为了解决上述问题。
But what if you want to use XML but you don't want to deal with two documents?
但是如果想使用XML而又不想对付两个文档，该怎么办呢？
These two documents have different (generated) IDs and represent different movies.
这两个文档拥有不同的（生成）ID，代表不同的电影。
If two documents have the same data stored differently, are the documents the same?
如果两个文档有相同的数据，但存储的方式不同，那么这两个文档是相同的？
This is an example of disambiguating a common element when two documents are combined.
下面的例子消除了组合两个文档时对某一公共元素产生歧义。
In addition, the payroll journals and the employee signatures are separated on two documents.
此外，工资表和员工签名被分开在两张表格上。
Because the two documents may use different DTDs, they may resolve the same entity reference differently.
由于这两个文档可以使用不同的DTD，因此对相同实体引用的解析可以是不同的。
So for two documents, you can register an EntityResolver implementation that resolves entities identically.
所以，对于这两个文档，可以注册一个以相同方式解析实体的EntityResolver实现。
Often, you have two documents in memory and you would like to merge or include a part of one document into another.
通常，您会希望合并内存中的两个文档或者将一个文档中的部分内容加入到另一个文档中。
Though a very simple example, Listing 1 shows how two documents can be spliced together, each with their own caching rules.
尽管这个示例非常简单，但是清单1说明了如何把两个文档拼接在一起，这两个文档有自己的缓存规则。
So things get tricky when you want to find out if two documents "mean" the same thing — whether they are semantically equivalent.
因此当您想发现两个文档是否“代表”同一个事物，即是否在语义上等价时，事情就显得有点错综复杂了。
The next two documents are an Apache Weblog file (a compact set of line-oriented records), and an XML document created from this file.
下两个文件是ApacheWeblog文件(一组简洁的面向行的记录)及从这个文件创建的XML文档。
The problem with calling the rss-summary function multiple times with two documents sequentially is that the information isn't merged.
连续对两个文档多次调用rss - summary函数时存在的问题是信息无法合并。
Now, lest I confuse you, this is purely a theoretical discussion, and no APIs exist that will interpret these two documents as equivalent.
现在，为避免我把您弄糊涂，这纯粹是理论上的讨论，不存在任何API可将这两个文档解释为等价的。
The document equality question applies to many classes of XML documents: When are two documents identical according to application requirements?
文档等同问题出现在很多种XML文档中：根据应用程序的要求，何时两个文档相等？
Reportedly, private residential management authority includes two documents, a certificate is housing property, is a state land use permit.
据介绍，私有住宅的权属包括两个文件，一件是房屋产权证，一件是国有土地使用证。
The code below shows a PHP application that connects a Solr service, adds two documents to the index, and runs the part number query used previously.
下列代码显示了连接Solr服务、向索引中添加两个文档和运行先前使用的零部件号查询的PHP应用程序。
If you look at the first step in isolation (times not shown here), AXIOM does much better than the other document models, at least for the first two documents.
如果单独研究第一个步骤(这里没有显示时间)，AXIOM要比其他的文档模型好得多，至少对于前面两个文档来说是这样的。
Besides the separation of concerns, that separation of WSDL port type from the WSDL binding in two documents allows for any number of bindings for a given port type.
除了分开关注之外，将WSDL端口类型与两个文件之中的WSDL绑定隔离开来，支持给定端口类型下任意数量的绑定。
Two documents can be semantically equivalent even if they don't look the same — see the previous article for examples.
即使两个文档看起来不同，但在语义上可能是等价的，参见上一篇文章中的例子。
Two documents can be semantically equivalent even if they don't look the same — see the previous article for examples.
即使两个文档看起来不同，但在语义上可能是等价的，参见上一篇文章中的例子。
应用推荐