Method: 60 cases were randomly assigned to two groups, 30 cases in treatment group taken Xiangsha Liujun Decoction plus ondansetron, and 30 in control simply taken ondansetron as comparison.
方法：60例随机分为两组，治疗组30例应用香砂六君汤加恩丹西酮治疗，对照组单纯用恩丹西酮治疗30例作比较。
Giving systematic education to the educational group while the control group only accept unclassied treatment, lastly two groups are compared each other with neopathy and result of treat.
对教育组进行了系统的健康教育，对照组只接受了一般性的治疗护理，然后对两组患者进行并发症及治疗效果方面的比较。
METHODS: This experiment included 4 groups: normal control group, asthmatic model group, dexamethasone treatment group and Jiaomu Oil treatment group, involving 10 guinea pigs in each group.
方法：实验分为4组：正常对照组、哮喘模型组、地塞米松治疗组和椒目油治疗组，每组各10只豚鼠。
Methods:230 patients were divided randomly into two groups:120 patients in treatment group treated by Beautyberry Pills and 110 patients in control group treated by Cephradine Capsules.
方法：230例患者随机分为治疗组120例，应用裸花紫珠片治疗；对照组110例，应用头孢拉啶胶囊治疗。
Two groups of patients after the treatment of blood pressure conditions were obviously improved, and restore group on the improvement of their superior to the control group.
两组患者治疗后血压情况都得到了明显改善，而恢复组的改善情况要优于对照组。
Results: Total effective rate of treatment group and control group was 88.24% and 65%, respectively, with significant differences between groups(P<0.05).
结果：治疗组总有效率为88.24%，对照组总有效率65%，两组比较差异有显著性（P<0.05）。
The effects of decompression were similar in two groups, and the total effective rate was 80% in control group while 85% in treatment group (P > 0.05).
治疗后两组的降压疗效接近，对照组患者的总有效率为80%，观察组的总有效率为85%（P>0.05）。
Methods (1) All rats were randomly divided into several groups: normal group, control group, COPD group (model group), EM treatment groups, EM preventive and treatment groups.
方法：（1）将动物分成正常组、对照组、COPD组（模型组）、红霉素治疗组、红霉素预防治疗组。
Results the complete control rate for dizziness was 87.9% in the treatment group and 27.0% in the control group with a statistically significant difference between the two groups.
结果：治疗组眩晕的完全控制率为87.9%，对照组眩晕的完全控制率27.0%，两组差别有统计学意义。
Methods: 117 patients with cough variant asthma were randomly divided into two groups, namely, 60 cases in treatment group and control group 57 patients.
方法：将117例咳嗽变异性哮喘患儿随机分为两组，即治疗组60例和对照组57例。
Results:After treatment, the clinical symptom score significantly decreased in both groups(P<0.01), and the therapeutic effect of the treatment group was superior to that in the control group(P<0.01).
结果：两组治疗后临床症状积分均比治疗前显著降低（P<0.01），且治疗组疗效明显优于对照组（P<0.01）；
Method: 120 cases randomly divided into two groups. 60 cases in the treatment group were treated by Shengjiang power and cases in the control group treated by Yigan Jiedu capsules.
方法：将120例患者随机分为两组，治疗组60例用加味升降散治疗，对照组60例用乙肝解毒胶囊治疗。
Rats in the acupuncture group were given acupuncture treatment for 28 days, and rats in the normal and control groups were put into fixation-machine for 10 minutes every day, lasting for 28 days.
针刺组大鼠给以针刺治疗28天，正常组和对照组大鼠分别每天放入大鼠固定器中适应10分钟，持续28天。
Methods: 64 infants with RVE were randomly divided into two groups: treatment group with Shuangling Antidiarrheal Oral Liquor and control group with the usual treatment.
方法：64例轮状病毒肠炎患儿随机分成双苓止泻口服液治疗组和常规治疗对照组。
Methods 54 patients with pressure ulcer were divided into two groups-treatment group and control group.
将54例有压疮的住院患者随机均分为治疗组和对照组。
Methods The patients were randomized to two groups: treatment group, containing 16, by electric acupuncture and Fentazin; control group, containing 14, by Fentazin only.
方法随机分两组，治疗组16例，采用电针加奋乃静，对照组14例，单纯用奋乃静。
Results: The response rate of treatment group was 85% , and 59.1 % for the control group( P< 0.05 ). There was no difference between in toxicity two groups.
结果：胸水控制率治疗组为85％，对照组为59．1％，治疗组疗效明显优于对照组（P<0．05）。
Method: 80 patients are randomly classified into 2 groups. The control group is composed of 37 patients and given conventional treatment and rehabilitation.
方法：80例患者随机分为2组，其中对照组37例，给予常规治疗及康复训练；
Methods 60 cases of KOA patient were divided into two groups randomly, treatment group 30 cases and control group 30 cases.
方法将60例膝关节骨关节炎的患者随机分为治疗组与对照组，每组30例，治疗组采用汽疗、膝关节松动术、肌力训练治疗；
Methods the cases of upper extremity lymphedema after breast cancer surgery were randomized into treatment group and control group and the efficacy was observed in two groups.
方法乳腺癌术后上肢淋巴水肿患者随机分为治疗组与对照组，观察两组的疗效。
The control group were treated with liver-protecting treatment, and the treatment group was added with Danshen Injectio based on the control. Both groups were treated for 4 weeks.
治疗组在对照组保肝治疗的基础上加用丹参注射液，两组疗程均为4周。
Methods: 80 patients with autoimmune hepatitis were divided at random into two groups: treatment group (40 cases) and control group (40 cases).
方法：将80例自身免疫型肝炎患者随机分为治疗组40例和对照组40例。
Methods: 64 cases were allocated to 2 groups randomly, 32 cases in each group. Treatment group treated by XZL and 5% of sodium morrhuate injection under gastroscope for control group.
方法：将64例患者随机分为2组各32例，治疗组以消痔灵、对照组以5％鱼肝油酸钠，胃镜下分点注射治疗。
The cure rates of treatment group and control group were 82%, 65%, and the relapse rates of that two groups were 9%, 25% respectively. There were significant differences between two groups.
治疗组患者的有效率为82%，对照组为65%，治疗组患者复发率为9%，对照组为25%，两组患者上述指标间差异有统计学意义。
MethodsThe total 80 patients of pulmonary tuberculosis were divided into two groups at random: the treatment group and the control group.
方法将80例肺结核患者随机分为利福平注射液组和利福平胶囊组对照，观察疗效。
Score after treatment both groups showed steady improvements in the control group and significantly higher than the total effective rate.
在单项症状控显率和总有效率方面，观察组均明显高于对照组。
Method: All the 80 patients enrolled were randomly divided in to two groups, 40 in acupuncture & moxibustion treatment group and the other 40 in oral - clomiphene control group.
方法：将80例患者随机分为针灸治疗组40例和口服克罗米芬对照组40例，观察并比较两组的临床疗效。
Methods The total 40 patients of pulmonary tuberculosis were divided into two groups at random: the treatment group and the control group.
方法采用随机对照试验，将具有明显中毒症状的40例肺结核患者随机分为痰热清组和对照组，观察痰热清的疗效。
Using the individual health education procedure in the treatment group and the traditional health education method was used in the control group. Compared the clinical effects between these 2 groups.
对照组按传统的健康教育方法，观察组按个体化健康教育程序进行宣教，将2组效果评价进行对比。
Compared with immunosuppressed control group, there were less alveolar interstitial lymphocytes, foamy intra-alveolar exudate and inflammation of lung tissue in rats of drug treatment groups.
黄芩苷各治疗组肺组织炎症较免疫抑制对照组明显减轻，肺间质炎性细胞浸润及肺泡腔泡沫样渗出物均明显减少。
应用推荐