The differences are not only the discourse rules in relation to the relationship between logic and cognition but also a kind of metaphor and symbol characteristic of their own cultures.
它们的篇法不只是与逻辑和认知相联系的话语规则，本身就是隐喻和象征，是对各自民族文化性格的生动写照。
What place can it occupy in each type of discourse, what functions can it assume, and by obeying what rules?
它可以在每种话语中占据什么样的位置，它在遵循什么原则的情况下可以有什么样的功能？
Free indirect discourse is constructed by the substitution of those subjects, and the rules of substitution coincide with general grammar.
自由间接引语即由潜在的多个主体之间的代换而构成，而且代换规则与一般语法规则一致。
The author tries to explain the limitation of passive input and the four reasons of pragmatic failures: pragmatic structure of discourse, speech rules, politeness strategy and indirect speech act.
语用失误的原因较多，作者从话语语用结构，说话规则，礼貌原则和间接言语行为四方面解释受试者的语用失误，并进一步分析被动输入在解决这类失误方面的局限性。
The author tries to explain the limitation of passive input and the four reasons of pragmatic failures: pragmatic structure of discourse, speech rules, politeness strategy and indirect speech act.
语用失误的原因较多，作者从话语语用结构，说话规则，礼貌原则和间接言语行为四方面解释受试者的语用失误，并进一步分析被动输入在解决这类失误方面的局限性。
应用推荐