But if Plessy was not wrong, how is it that Brown came out so differently?
但是，如果普莱西案没有判错的话，那为何布朗案却会得出完全不同的判决呢？
Was Plessy wrongly decided in 1896 or have changing times made it no longer applicable?
Plessy案是否在1896年错判或者随时代的改变已经使得它已不再适用？
Brown ended the era of separate-but-equal, whose paradigm was the decision in 1896 of the case called Plessy v.
布朗案结束了一个“分离但是平等”的时代，1896年时有一个案例称作“普莱西起诉富卡松案”Plessy v。
Most damagingly, they turned up a 1952 memorandum in which he supported the “separate but equal” Plessy ruling of 1896, which had established segregation.
更为严重的是，他们翻出1952年的一份备忘录，发现他支持1896年Plessy案“隔离但平等”的裁决，而这正是种族隔离的基础。
The distinguished lawyer Charles Hamilton Houston was born in 1895, eight months before the Supreme Court's "separate but equal" ruling in Plessy vs. Ferguson.
1895年，就在最高法院对普莱西和弗格森颁布了“隔离但平等”的制度8个月前，著名的律师查尔斯·汉密尔顿·休斯敦出生了。
The distinguished lawyer Charles Hamilton Houston was born in 1895, eight months before the Supreme Court's "separate but equal" ruling in Plessy vs. Ferguson.
1895年，就在最高法院对普莱西和弗格森颁布了“隔离但平等”的制度8个月前，著名的律师查尔斯·汉密尔顿·休斯敦出生了。
应用推荐