The patients were given either conscious sedation or an intra-articular lidocaine block for the reduction and for the application of a plaster splint.
他们都被列入了一个前瞻性的随机研究中。在复位以及石膏夹板固定的过程中，这些病例接受了清醒麻醉或是关节内利多卡因阻滞。
Objective: To evaluate the superiority of the curative effects in treating distal radius fractures by t plate internal fixation and plaster splint external fixation.
目的：研究比较T形钢板内固定与石膏夹板外固定治疗桡骨远端骨折的疗效优越性。
Methods: 59 cases of distal radius fracture from 2002.9 to 2005.1 were classified into two groups. They were treated by T plate internal fixation and plaster splint external fixation respectively.
方法：将2002年9月-2005年1月59例桡骨远端骨折分为2组，分别采用切开复位T形钢板内固定和石膏夹板外固定治疗。
RESULTS:Tension band pin was most stable with more bear, the following group was cross pin, traction. Plaster and splint was least unstable.
结果张力带钢针最稳定，承载最大，其次是交叉钢针、牵引、石膏夹板固定最差。
Results Tension band pin group was most stable, followed by cross pin, traction, plaster and splint.
结果：张力带钢针最稳定，承载最大，其次是交叉钢针、牵引，石膏夹板固定最差。
There were no significant differences in pain between two groups(P>0.05). Occurrence of complications in tension band splint group were lower than that of plaster fixation group(P<0.05).
疼痛情况两组差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。两种固定后期并发症发生，张力带夹板组明显低于石膏固定组（P<0.05）。
There were no significant differences in pain between two groups(P>0.05). Occurrence of complications in tension band splint group were lower than that of plaster fixation group(P<0.05).
疼痛情况两组差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。两种固定后期并发症发生，张力带夹板组明显低于石膏固定组（P<0.05）。
应用推荐