Objective: To compare the effect of direct percutaneous transluminal coronary intervention (PCI) and urokinase (UK) thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
目的：对比直接冠状动脉介入术(PCI)及静脉尿激酶(UK)溶栓治疗急性心肌梗死(ami)的疗效。
Objective: To compare the effect of direct percutaneous transluminal coronary intervention (PCI) and urokinase (UK) thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
目的：对比直接冠状动脉介入术(PCI)及静脉尿激酶(UK)溶栓治疗急性心肌梗死(ami)的疗效。
应用推荐