We chose mutual takeover rather than a standby configuration for two reasons
出于下列两个理由，我们选择了相互接管，而非备用配置
In a mutual takeover configuration, all nodes are performing highly available (movable) work.
在相互接管（mutual takeover）配置中，所有节点都执行高可用性（可移动的）任务。
We therefore decided to have a mutual takeover scenario, with DB2 UDB ESE V8.1, and two instances per server.
我们决定用DB 2UDBESEV8.1获得相互接管场景，每个服务器有两个实例。
Also, a mutual takeover can only be implemented if the two applications are distinct and use different databases.
同样，如果两个应用程序是不同的，且使用不同的数据库，就只能实现相互接管。
The systems can also be configured in a mutual takeover configuration where both servers are actively hosting different databases.
可以将两个系统配置为相互接管的配置，使两个服务器都处于活动状态，分别容纳不同的数据库。
Overall, the mutual takeover scenario is also a very good solution for the case where the environment needs two separate databases.
总之，相互接管场景也是需要两个单独数据库的环境的极佳解决方案。
Each server had two instances of DB2, since we were using DB2 UDB ESE without the partitioning feature and we needed to implement mutual takeover.
每台服务器都拥有两个DB 2实例，因为我们使用的是不带分区功能的DB 2UDBESE，所以我们还需要实现相互接管。
Each server had two instances of DB2, since we were using DB2 UDB ESE without the partitioning feature and we needed to implement mutual takeover.
每台服务器都拥有两个DB 2实例，因为我们使用的是不带分区功能的DB 2UDBESE，所以我们还需要实现相互接管。
应用推荐